Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF Grading: Panthers 2nd Overall On Season


fieryprophet

Recommended Posts

Holy ish. We're also the only team in the NFL to grade positively in every facet of the game.

 

UKf7Urx.png

 

Also: https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2013/10/14/pff-reaction-blog-week-6/

 


15.00 – Panthers at Vikings Game Notes

- The three highest graded players were Travelle Wharton (+5.2), Phil Loadholt (+3.8) and Greg Olsen (+3.6)

- The three lowest graded players were Jared Allen (-4.9) and both Xavier Rhodes and Chris Cook (-2.4)

- Greg Jennings led the Vikings in running 44 routes. That was 11 more than Jerome Simpson. Rookie Cordarrelle Patterson ran 15 but was only targeted twice on those.

- The Panthers had as many touchdowns (two) as forced missed tackles.

- The Vikings used just four defensive packages the entire game. On 34 plays they had a base 4-3 and 4-2-5 formation while using a dime package on just one snap. The other two snaps were their goalline package.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from that link about the Giants Bears game

 

The three lowest graded players were Julius Peppers (-3.9), Shea McClellin (-3.1) and both Shaun Rogers and Antrel Rolle (-2.8)

 

A victory for father time? Peppers rushed the passer on 22 occasions but generated just one hurry.

 

 

 

 

buuahaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ideally Bryce and the other starters should get at least a full quarter and an argument could be made for 2 full quarters given how they've played early in the season the last few years.
    • A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...