Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tom Brady and the no-huddle


hepcat

Recommended Posts

I have a question - I seem to remember Carolina's defense getting beat pretty badly against the Eagles during the pre-season because of the uptempo no-huddle offense they run.  For years, Tom Brady has run a quick, no-huddle style offense.  I've watched every Panthers game this year and I can't think of any team that really tried to beat Carolina's defense with quick no-huddle calls.  Should we expect to see a lot of that tonight - and could it be bad for the defense?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way they do it unless they're trying to put us away after we make some early mistakes. They score fast, they keep our defense fresh the whole game and our offense has more time to work with. They'll run their offense a little faster than the 9ers did, but only in the sense that the huddle will be short and they'll hurry to the line. Their objective HAS to be "run the ball, make safe passes, get first downs, chew up clock" if they want to win this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try your best to diguise your defense, make the QB try and disect the 'D" in a couple of seconds, if he can't, audibles can't be called, confusion sets in and the "hurry up" breaks down. The downside of this is of course Brady who is a master of the"up tempo" offense. If the Bengals and Jets can do it.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Expect lots of no huddle quick tempo spreading us out.....

We got to stop them on first down. Hard to get the no huddle up and running unless you get the positve play in the early down. We also need to come out and force them out of the quick pass. Give them a shot at beating is deep.....gives us the best shot at getting Brady

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have seen fast speeds against Philly in the preseason and Buffalo in game two.

 

I do think we will see some tonight.  Like a midget at a urinal we will have to be on our toes

 

Pie for the midget at a urinal reference that I'm stealing for the RL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speculation in Boston is the Pats will run 4-5 wide. Conceed the power run game (because we're such a good run stuffing team), and dink and dunk our defense to death.

If Brady stays upright, it could work. Don't forget this is the first game of the season the Pats will have all of their offensive weapons. Gronk, replacement Welker, and Vereen being healthy makes a difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...