Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Any Early Games We Should Have A Rooting Interest In?


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

It sucks hairy donkey balls that I can't at least watch the Saints get destroyed by the Rams in the early games as they also play at 4pm (F U NFL). That being said, are there any early games we should carry about that would improve our playoff chances regardless of the scenario? I'm guessing we should be hoping the Bears and Niners both lose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle is a given. I love to see any chinks in their armor since I fully expect our boys to meet them for the NFC Champ game.

 

But I'm also keeping an eye on Philly because they are in race with Dallas and we might end up playing one of them. I'd rather it be Dallas.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actually pulling for the Falcons to win out.  Knocking them further down the draft ladder.

Don't want Clowney in our division.

 

Samething with the Bucs, not to mention we need more San Fran losses in our playoff picture.

 

Pulling for the Giants over Seattle, just to keep things interesting.

 

Pulling for the Browns over the Bears in case things get interesting the other way.

 

Vikes over the Eagles, although it's pretty much a given that Philly will win their division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...