Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canada Strikes Down Anti-Prostitution Laws


Captroop

Recommended Posts

Canada...You just went up a notch in my book!

 

...Don't get excited though; that just puts you at notch 1.

 

Canada Strikes Down Anti-Prostitution Laws

 

So technically, it's been legal the whole time in Canada, but certain activities were banned, kind of like Weed laws in Amsterdam. I think it's time we just go ahead and do likewise here. It's been around since the dawn of man; it ain't goin' away. You might as well make the practice safer for all parties involved. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now the question will be, can they head off a tide of human trafficking that might be coming.

I'm in favour of decriminalising sex work, but there will now likely be problems with this.  The other problem associated with the exploitation of sex workers, of course, is pimping.  It's only different from human trafficking in that it's not about transporting humans for the purpose of sexual slavery, but the slavery part remains.

 

I just hope they can find a way to avoid this.  Europe's (particularly in the Netherlands', Belgium's, and Germany's) issues with trafficking are significant, and differentiating between those who work willingly versus by coercion (especially among those from Eastern Europe) is difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OL then RB would make heads explode but its might not be too unlikely 
    • Wonder if we draft a RB. Seems like a lot of eggs in Brooks’ basket right now.  And the OL, no kidding. If that running game goes to hell with what we have at QB, you can forget competing. It is so much more important than sticking another wideout on the field. Take your wideout later. 
    • I have lots of different thoughts on it. This argument, the primary thing is I don’t like seeing him or anyone, being convicted on hearsay and/or pure speculation. Which some are doing.  I don’t care That much about defending Morgan as I do about the criticism being fair minded.    You sort of assert that Dan was just a yes man. I don’t think we know if he ever pushed back against Fitterer but I have this instinct thing that needs me to satisfy the question of: if Tepper was so down on a Fitterer as to fire him, why in the world would he hire his carbon copy? I guess maybe he wanted a yes man.Like I said, lots of different thoughts.     I am just not gonna judge him that harshly based only on speculation. I am sticking with what he has done starting when he was hired as GM. Maybe I am more lenient because the first season for him and Canales, I gave both a pass. Said I would judge them after the first year. Stuck to it. If you can get to the reality that neither were ready for the job and say okay give them a year get their feet wet, it looks a lot better.    And we are not bound to Bryce yet. Yes, for yet another fuging year he can probably marginally improve and slide by like he has been doing. But if they add even more people and he regresses? I think we could see some relief.    The QB room? As I understand it, Pickett was Canales’ choice. If we need to blame people for poo. In a sense, he is very Bryce like. So makes a good plug in. I get that a little bit. We still have the draft. If they do better than Jake Plummer or Hooker I’ll know they are trying.   
×
×
  • Create New...