Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Steve Smith has a torn PCL


Recommended Posts

What is the recovery time for that type of injury?

 

I have heard from two places now (NFL Network, article online) that Smith believes he has 'ligament damage' or a torn PCL.

 

Is he done for the year? If we get a bye... could be be ready in three weeks?

 

Even for a sprain the recovery is weeks. If there is any real damage or a tear he will be in for months.

 

Unless it is very mild I am guessing he is out for the season.

 

I am not a medically licensed professional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn, I hate this.  Even taking away his production or stats, we nee the guy's fire and passion on the field, intimidating the DB's and playing the mind games.  He brings so many intangibles to this offense, I just laugh when I read about his irrelevance because outsiders only look at yards and touchdowns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you get into a car accident or fall directly on your knee, it's pretty hard to just mess up the PCL. In sports it's usually injured when one of the other tendons tear.You don't see a whole lot of just PCL tears in sports. It's really uncommon, but it's a bad injury because of the difficulty in repairing a complete tear. 

 

When talking about knee ligaments, sprains are tears, just depends on the degree of the sprain. If it's a grade 1 or 2, then they usually don't do surgery and it takes a couple months to recover from. Grade 1 is a partial tear of the PCL, grade 2 is a complete tear of the PCL.  If it's a grade 3, that means that either the ACL or MCL was torn along with the PCL and it's a 6-12 month ordeal. 

 

The reason they don't do surgery on a grade 1 or 2 is because the PCL is difficult to repair and incredibly easy to stretch out if the tendon is replaced, so typically the only time they do a surgery on one is if another ligament is injured requiring a surgery to begin with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn, I hate this.  Even taking away his production or stats, we nee the guy's fire and passion on the field, intimidating the DB's and playing the mind games.  He brings so many intangibles to this offense, I just laugh when I read about his irrelevance because outsiders only look at yards and touchdowns.

 

I could not put it any better, he brings so much heart and passion. Would hate to not have that in post season. Still we don't know the full extent yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having Ginn, Hixon, Lafell and Olsen all on the field will have it's own positives.

 

There will be no "go to" guy and defenses and Cam will have to spread the ball and coverages around.  Could actually work out okay for us.  Smitty will be on the sidelines either way and will NOT let the intensity level diminish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i looked at the thread title and ny hearr sank because my eyes skipped ober the "if" part.

 

that said....we'll find out soon enough exactly what to worry about. rifht now there are juat too many possibilities and we'll know what it is today. i'll worry about it then.

 

there are four possible outcomes, tho.

 

he will be fine and not miss any time

he will not miss time, but be playing at a diminished capacity

he will miss a week or two, but be ready for round two of the playoffs or the nfc cg or maybe even the superbowl(provided we make it that far)

he is done for the season.

 

whatever the case, we'll have to deal with it. next man up.

 

i won't be dwelling on the implications of all that right now, tho. i can wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They're examples of denying reality. Here are some others: ,- Bryce is the worst QB in the NFL right now (no he isn't) - Bryce is the worst QB in NFL history (no he's not; that's stupid) - Well then Bryce is at least the the worst QB in the league over the last three years (nope, he's actually improved a lot since year one, which was a turbulent year anyway) - That's not true, he hasn't Improved one but since his rookie year (oh come on) 🙄 - Well, even if he did, we can't win with him (obviously we can) - Yeah but not unless everyone else is damn near perfect (think the game film from our wins this year would back that up?) - Even so, we won those games in spite of him (officially the stupidest argument available) And no, those are made up. You can find those quotes and other equally moronic statements in various threads around the board. I know some folks always need to characterize whatever they're against as the worst thing in existence. It's hyperbole, and it's hypersilly. Likewise, you've got some who are so absolutely emotional about it that even if you think Bryce isn't good enough (which I do) they'll still call you a stan if you don't agree to label him the lousiest passer in existence 🙄 It's just dumb, and it's not realistic. But on the flipside, here are some statements which are; - Bryce is indeed capable of both playing in, and winning, an NFL game. Not on a consistent level though, and consistency is huge. - He is also capable of completing mid-range and even some deep passes; hell, he threw a beauty this past Sunday  - Yes, he has improved over his rookie season and over last year. Arguing against that is disingenuous. - Believe it or not, other players are the roster do make mistakes in games also.  - And lastly, while I know it hurts some people's narrative and arguments, Bryce does indeed deserve credit for the winning games he's played in this season. ... Every single one of those statements is true. And since i acknowledge all that, I must be in favor of keeping him in place then Except I'm not 😕 ... Don't know of anyone who doesn't think he'll get the fifth year option. Not ready to guarantee anything beyond that, though. So bottom line: Yeah, Bryce is fully expected to be our quarterback through next year. If there were a logical, realistic path to acquire a more capable starter and transition Bryce to a backup I'd be elated, but that's a pipe dream. This where we're at  I don't **** it, you don't like it, others don't either. But here We are so let's make the best of it that we can.
    • What does it matter how fast the wrs are with Bryce he is not hitting them anyway
    • Let's be real. Signing Matt Kalil who was at the time inconsistent at best was always an extremely risky move and largely initiated by the fact he was related to one of our most prominent players Ryan Kalil. Memories get fuzzy the longer time passes I guess. Go watch some old Panthers games with Ted Ginn nearly losing us games. Then watch Cam Newton keep going back to him again and again and again. Then read all the Xavier Legette criticism while making excuses for Bryce being swept by rookie 2nd round pick Tyler Shough. Throwing TMac under the bus is just further proof how deranged the Bryce Young defense force has become. Bryce Young can barely compete in this gutter iteration of the NFC South. Let's see him take this WR core to the playoffs in an NFC South with Drew Brees and Matt Ryan
×
×
  • Create New...