Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

#1 seed vs. saints missing the playoffs


#1 seed vs. saints missing playoffs  

208 members have voted

  1. 1. would you rather the panthers be the #1 seed, or the saints miss the playoffs

    • #1 seed
      157
    • no playoffs for the saints
      51


Recommended Posts

Aints misses the Playoffs!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I rather play the Cardinals than Drew Brees, even though Arizona's defense is pretty nasty. But, I feel good playing Cardinals, SF, or any other wild card teams at home.

I'd keep the no.1 seed and go to Seattle. Not even flinching.

Did this even make sense to you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both or #1 seed if I had to choose.

 

yep you have to choose. only way the saints miss the playoffs is if AZ wins on sunday (plus a Saints loss). only way we get homefield is if AZ loses (plus a Carolina win and Seattle loss).

 

i would like either scenario honestly. Carolina can still capture the division which is all i actually care about. a win guarantees us at least 2nd seed and at least one home playoff game. 

 

that being said, as long as Carolina wins, i would actually rather have NO stay out of the postseason and the Panthers be relegated to the second seed. That way AZ or SF can go to Seattle and play a 3rd division game. i see those other two representatives from the NFCw as the best chances to beat Seattle before we have to face them. We can beat Seattle in Seattle, but i'd rather host a wild card team at home that just played a hard game in Seattle. in other words, second seed gives us the good chance that we host two playoff games even as the second seed. with the upside that there would be no New Orleans to foul things up. of course, first seed guarantees us two home games anyway and im not afraid of New Orleans playing in Charlotte in January. all that to say... IT DOESNT MATTER. i hope we get the 1st seed but i also hope the Aints dont go. cant have the best of both worlds so i'll be happy with either scenario

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want what is best for the Panthers more than I want what is worst for the Saints.

Agreed, but that's why I went with Saints missing. I high seeding seems to mean less than it did before. However, playing a division rival that you just pissed off at the end of the regular season still means a lot. Can the Psnthers beat them in the playoffs? Of course. I'd just rather not give them a chance at knocking us out. I don't give a fug what they do if we end up in the Super Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hope you understand that this Anti Bryce thing as you call it is really a pro Panthers thing. I think I can safely use we. We want the best for the Panthers.  As far as this other post saying ‘Anti’ Bryce people do misinformation.. you mean like going all in on “Renfro should have caught” that poorly thrown ball? I guess it was week 1. And calling it a drop. Comical btw.  I wonder, did you call that out or let it slide because it aligned with your agenda? 
    • These are great posts with the comparisons and the numbers.   I haven’t lookyat Smity’s numbers since probably the first time he was on the ballot.  But if you watched every week you know what he is. Whatever his yardage or targets numbers were.  He was fuging dominant. I have watched since the AFL days and seen who there is to see. There are many great WRs over the years. GREAT WRs. Smitty is up there in the game of football. 
    • Smith is clear cut HOF if you judge what he did by reception. Fitzgerald was a stat padder.    The most Steve Smith was ever targeted in his career was in 2005 (150 targets). The same year he wins the triple crown.    Larry Fitzgerald was targeted more than 150 times over 9 separate seasons. Not once eclipsing 1500 yards in a season.    The over glazing of Larry Fitzgerald going around is way over blown. ARZ was top 10 in passing attempts nearly his entire prime. Steve Smith and Andre Johnson had it far worse and would have surpassed his #s in the same situation.
×
×
  • Create New...