Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Oher has underachieved in B-more. Could Matsko get him right?


top dawg

Recommended Posts

A pretty good story on the big screen. On the field, not so much. Oher may be playing his last game as a Raven on Sunday.

 

 

... Oher struggled at left tackle and was eventually moved to the right side. A position change hasn't solved his issues -- Oher currently ranks 68th out of 76 qualified tackles, according to ProFootballFocus.com...

...Oher hasn't been a total bust for the Ravens. He's never missed a game during his career and was an every-week starter during Baltimore's Super Bowl run last season.

 

 

 Just an idea. For those who actually know something about developing talent or resurrecting an offensive lineman's career, do you think that Oher is worth a look?

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oher has not underachieved on the field in my opinion. He is a big man, and bigger men have a history in the NFL to not be consistent due to injuries. It's no different than any other bigger lineman.

I would make the argument that he has overachieved actually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im interested in him. I just don't know if his problems are just being coached up. if that's the case ill take him over Bell. should be able to get good price based on season aka Hakeem Nicks.

 

Would anybody here choose to sign Nicks and Oher over the Kraken?? Just curious

 

There is absolutely no doubt he is more physically gifted than Bell. Bell is really over achieving based on his athletic ability. Oher just hasn't put it together, I don't want to speculate because I don't watch him often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Oher hasn't worked out at right tackle for the ravens after moving him from the left side, why would one think he would do better as a Carolina Panther?

I mean, he's been in the league awhile and I feel sure that the Ravens have decent DL coaches. Plus, If the Panthers went the free agent route to help improve our DL there are probably as good or even better players to be obtained at a lesser price.

 

 (" Oher struggled at left tackle and was eventually moved to the right side. A position change hasn't solved his issues -- Oher currently ranks 68th out of 76 qualified tackles, according to ProFootballFocus.com.")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...