Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The play calls at the end of the game were NOT playoff caliber


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Gotta love fans that believe they can call a better game than the coaches. Armchair QBs are the cutest things.

 

Get Cam under control and the Offense will pick up. How many passes did he miss again today? 4 that I can think of off the top of my head. 2 of them would have been big gainers.

 

But by all means. Email Shula with your play suggestions. I am quite sure he will take them to heart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol how unironic

A thread created for some discussion on playcalling analysis, and just like any other critical thinking thread after a win the same coalition of forest-for-the-trees cretins are fusing into some giant megazord threadshitting their pre-programmed censurings at literally any living creature that could've had a problem with the playcalling in today's game

"SUm pPl Ar NEVaR HAPpy I SwEar!!!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didnt read the whole thread, but we're playoff bound with the number 2 seed.  We've already beaten plenty of playoff bound teams with our questionable playcalling, namely SF, NE, and NO (we also should have beaten SEA and have #1 seed).

 

Look at it from this perspective, why do anything different than what's worked most of the year?  If you show any wrinkles at this point in the year, then you're basically telling the team we face in the playoffs what to expect if we start struggling.  Save the good stuff for the playoffs and win the Lambardi. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am usually more of a pessimist type concerning my teams in football but to get the Panthers into the playoffs with a first round bye with the offensive talent that we have now is one of the most unbelievably greatest coaching jobs I have ever witnessed in my many many years.   With Smith out....a patchwork offensive line....a receiving corps that struck fear into no one.....and Cam throwing 5 yards over everyone's head for the first 20 minutes of play we still WON.  Incredible job.   This isn't video game football.  Go back to your couches with your play stations and x boxes if you don't enjoy it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I'll say is  IF Seattle is the the best the NFC has then i feel pretty good. I watched the first half of the Sea.- St.L game, and if the Rams had half a QB they would have probably won. BTW the falcons (as much as I hate them ) are a better team than their record....they took the 9ers to the wire last week.. Lighten up....we've got two weeks to rest, get 89 healed up and look at our mistakes on film....enjoy it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They won the game because the Falcons nutted up. It's not too much to ask for your squad to get a fuging first down to put the game on ice.

Chicken poo play calling will only take you so far.

Is that also why we are 12-4 and have won 10 out of the last 11 games.

Holy poo the collective ignorance in this thread is amazing.

We make the Atlanta fans from the Vick era look like a fuging think tank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the moment, I would give our offense about a 4 out of 10.  Not what you want heading into the playoffs.

 

Not that others don't see it, but they pick their favorite player (Cam) and level blame at the rest of the offense and coaching.

 

There is enough blame to go around for sure.  If a coach calls a play and it does not work, is it poor execution or a poor call?  Could be either or both.

 

We do not block well, throw well, get open well, secure the ball well, and yet Shula is our main issue?  Grow up and admit that there are a few bright spots occasionally from our offense, but lack of execution and its effects are not on one person but the entire unit has definite room to improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...