Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hypothetical....imagine we were traveling to Green Bay this weekend....

Hotsauce

By Hotsauce,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Hotsauce Explorer

Hotsauce

Posted
Posted

How would we match up against Green Bay in those elements?

I think we would have been playing all our guys, even with borderline health statuses like Smitty. The cold elements wouldn't bother me as much, seeing we are not a dome team. I think the Def would hold its own, and the Off would score enough against GB's weak def to win.

Hypothetically Panthers 17 Green Bay 13

I know some of you will get butt hurt over this thread, but it's a bye week, so play along or get out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chaos Veteran

Chaos

Posted
Posted

Because I am predicting an Eagles win, I just hope whoever wins the "real" game has what it takes to go into Seattle and win, bringing the NFCCG to Charlotte if we handle our business.

 

But to play along, we would go in there and win.  Tolbert would truck their defense repeatedly and Olsen would make clutch catches.  Our defense would tear them up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darth Biscuit Mentor

Darth Biscuit

Posted
Posted

All I know is I would not miss it. I wonder if camera gear freezes up at -20

 

I can't even imagine that... idk how those guys play it in or how the fans sit in it and watch.  I honestly don't think I could do either.

 

I think the Panthers could do ok in that weather...  same as playing Brees or Manning... we'd have to get our front 7 in Rodgers face and disrupt him or he'd tear the secondary apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Barry McCaulkinor

Guest Barry McCaulkinor

Posted
Posted

All I know is I would not miss it. I wonder if camera gear freezes up at -20

Nope. Mine worked great in Fairbanks and it gets sub negative 40

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PghPanther Mentor

PghPanther

Posted
Posted

Could favors ball control and strong defenses....................Panthers could do well.

 

That said, cold frightens me to death for the health of players with regards to keeping muscles flexible throughout the game.....

 

....it would be so easy for a skill player to pull a hammy or quad after being dormant for even a few minutes..........

 

You would need lots of stationary bikes around with heaters blowing on the lower leg area........lol!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • kungfoodude
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • tukafan21
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...