Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chargers/Bengals Game Thread

Jangler

By Jangler,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

FootballMaestro Newbie

FootballMaestro

Posted
Posted

 I am still waiting for  Panthers fan to admit that Cam need some serious help. Everyone seems to be talking about the weapons today's QBs need to make them look good but your QB just have to work HARDER and settle for what he has been dealing with for three seasons now in the eyes of some.

 

Funny you say that: When I watch all these pre-game shows, so many of them talked about how "the receivers [of said teams] need to step up". But you notice, you never hear that about the Panthers, cause every knows their receivers are so bad. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FootballMaestro Newbie

FootballMaestro

Posted
Posted

This is funny but so darn truthful.

 

Even worst would be the endless threads trying to spin those dropped balls as some how being ALL Cam's fault. 

 

Yup Yup. 

 

And I hope all these yahoos, are watching this game and reading this. 

 

If not, we know they either aren't real football fans, or they just have an axe to grind with cam, and pretend to like and support him. 

 

And yes we can talk about this now, cause it's half time! LoL

 

Dalton threw about 7 high or bad throws in a row, that were caught by HIS RECEIVERS. A luxury Cam would never have. 

 

And instead of some here getting annoyed about us talking about this, they should wish or implore the Carolina Panthers to get Cam some decent receivers, who can make a bunch of "high" catches themselves!! It's not a "problem" when receivers catch them, like they're supposed to!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kakarot Newbie

Kakarot

Posted
Posted

Lafell would. Ginn couldn't get that high. Hixon maybe could.

Yea, Hixon might've made the catch. I don't give him the credit he deserves. It's no doubt Lafell drops it, and not only could Ginn not get that high but he would've been scared of getting hit. He would've definitely let that one go. Lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted

Funny you say that: When I watch all these pre-game shows, so many of them talked about how "the receivers [of said teams] need to step up". But you notice, you never hear that about the Panthers, cause every knows their receivers are so bad. lol

Yep, so instead you hear "Cam needs to step up", "Cam needs to do this", blah blah blah.

I really hope a certain few huddlers are watching these games this weekend but I doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FootballMaestro Newbie

FootballMaestro

Posted
Posted

Just think how many TD's (probably at least 30), INT's (maybe 6), and completion percentage (65%?) Cam would have, if he had receivers LIKE THESE; just based off of this year (take away 6 of his tipped INT's, and add 6 TD's that his receivers couldn't catch or get separation for)?

 

Whala, that's what good receivers can do for a QB and their team!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • rebelrouser
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...