Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

i dont know why the media would hate for us to make it to the superbowl


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

We're probably the only team that they can make storylines with any potential AFC opponent.

Broncos: hey! Remember when john fox coached the panthers? Let's recap this 12000 times over the next two weeks!

P.S. hey do you also remember that time Jerry Richardson talked to watermelon head Peyton Manning like a disgruntled grandpa talks to his grandson when he's making too much noise and M*A*S*H is on? Let's open that wound!

Colts: hey remember when Andrew Luck shitcanned declaring a year early because Carolina had the number 1 pick? Here's 30 minutes worth of a recap!

Chargers: hey this Ron Riviera guy used to coach for SD! Let's put up a million irrelevant defensive stat graphics from 2007-2010!

Patriots: So these two teams played TEN years ago in the same game and now they're back it's cray! Let's cut to john kasay fuging up the last kickoff again and again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

plus we have all kinds of interesting characters.

(in no particular order)

 

cam

smitty

kraken

tolbert (guaranteed he would be on the next dancing with the stars if the panthers go to the superbowl)

thomas davis (3 ACL surgeries can be talked about forever)

kalil (well, he's funny anyway and from southern cal so media people like him)

keuchly (boring, but the chicks dig him and the football geeks love him)

mike mitchell (just has a big mouth, but still...it's headline stuff)

olsen (looks like thor and has twins, one of them having heart issues)

 

what do the other teams have? a whole bunch of boring, that's what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fan base of the team or teams involved in a Super Bowl isn't the most important factor in viewership; it's how competitive the game is. Our Super Bowl XXXVIII in 2004 was the most watched (89.7 million viewers) since Super Bowl XXXII (Denver/Green Bay, 90.0 million viewers) in 1998.

 

Funny enough, the least watched Super Bowl since 1995 was the one that the Falcons made and got destroyed in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I find the Panthers the most entertaining team to watch in all of the NFL................

 

The have a great defense with potentials for lots of sacks and turnovers.

 

Their offense has the x factor with Cam........you just don't know what he is going to do next.

 

Last I checked.........isn't the NFL Sports entertainment?

 

The Panthers manage to win while making unpredictable plays to hang on at the end..........that's suspense and they do it more often than any other team this year.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...