-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
-
-
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
I definitely see your point, but the issue to me is this: Do we have the immediate urgency right now to draft a T in round 1 when there are other positions that could use starters from the draft? Secondly, I find this draft to be weak this year, with about 14 players with first round grades (arguably). I do not think the OTs in this draft are average, but there are more of them considered to be first round candidates based on the weakness of this draft. Since we have 2 proven starters, maybe we should draft a project later and if we have the need next year, draft the OT then? Your facts are indisputable, but we have to take our situation and the availability of talent at OT in 2026. This is a very debatable topic--so I definitely see your view. -
I look at it like get on top of the situation. Stay ahead of it. If it costs you a year of not drafting a starter at number three WR in the first so be it. We need new blood there in 2027 if not 2026, and need to get some OL on rookie deals. At the same time the big picture is considered, we have a QB that has yet to earn an extension and you can go glass half full if you want but he had about half the good games that he needed to have. Fewer, IMO, but the point is he is not a lock to earn an extension. Which would really put next year’s number one in play for QB and take OT off the table. So I think it needs to be on the table this year. -
By PNW_PantherMan · Posted
Feels like they just changed like 2 years ago.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.