Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will our defense be subject to the counter?


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

Meeks' new defensive philosophy is run-to-the-ball... swarm to the ball, even; the defensive front four put on the pressure, the LB's drop back and make the plays with the secondary.

The counter is designed to trick over-pursuing defenses; with the speed in our linebacking corps, will Meeks' defense be susceptible? If a team's offense can get our guys moving in the wrong direction at the beginning of the run, pursuing, all swarming to the ball, they could very well bust one in the opposite direction for a big gain.

Issue? non-issue?

(i'm no expert on defensive schemes, or offensive schemes for that matter, but it occurred to me while i was at work)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were doing that to us anyway.

well, sure, the counter is a common running play... the question is, more specifically, will the new defense's philosophy leave it more susceptible than it would otherwise be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will it make a difference? Not much IMO. Football is so much about getting the first step, that leverage. Everybody is strong everybody is super fast. You don't have very long for foolery. If the D is getting to the QB fast there is no time to stretch a play. If the DBs are serviceable you've got a very good chance with a talented D line.

The obvious question is do we have a talented D line? I have yet to be convinced and am optimistically awaiting a yes. We shall see...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only time that it might be a noticable problem would be guarding the wild cat againts the Dolphins. Hopefully Meeks will gameplan specifically for that game and have a spy on Brown or something.

I doubt the wild cat is going to be as effective this year... Henning and all his praise will be short lived...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could you make your signature a little bigger. Hurts my eyes to squint like that when it's so small.

this place is unbearable without turning signatures off.

at any rate, two things make a counter harder - smart play and good backside ends. Mike Rucker was fantastic at staying at home. He didn't overpursue, he didn't bite on the fake. He was there on reverses, counters, bootlegs.

We have good ends, hopefully they'll improve at discipline. Even Brayton, only an asset against the run compared to the others, struggles at this.

Cutbacks will be a minor concern, but to that end I'm more worried about power running games than anything else. If you can beat us to the LOS, and make a good block, we might not have a lot for you. Same for combo blocks if we can't make a pile.

Truthfully I have no concerns for our passing game issues (and we had a ton last year late). We have more rushers, we have new corners, and a good scheme for what we currently have to face. The c2 should see us bumping receivers more, and against the fairly slow NFCS receivers, I'll take that.

But there are some strong runners on the schedule, we have depth and potentially quality issues at DT, no backup with any run specialty, and an eagerness to get to the ball. It'll be like the 2004 run D problems...LBs losing gap integrity because they're trying to cover where they think the other guy won't be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh please with the wallowing in victimhood I'm going to take my ball and go home routine. You were just in here referring to people as super weird haters because they don't completely agree with your borderline delusional spin on what Bryce Young is and isn't as a fourth year starter. We can hope by some miracle that Bryce Young will actually be able to lead a formidable passing offense this season without being irrational homers and pretending verfiable data and what we have seen with our own two eyes doesn't tell us exactly what he has been to this point which is someone who moves the ball at a historically low rate.
    • I am curious who's behind all of this though. A video and photos from years ago surfacing? Someone has a vendetta and is driving this PR campaign. I'm loving it, but I'd also like to know who said mystery figure is. 
    • I say positive things about Bryce when he earns them. Which he has a handful of times. It is all here and on the record but your lobby won’t focus on that or the flat out truth inside of our critical comments.  It is a constant thing with him and his backers - one or two good things and people are trying to extrapolate that to proof we should commit to him, while ignoring or making excuses for the larger portion of his track record.  When he is able to consistently turn in franchise QB extension worthy outings the tone of the posts will reflect that.  I have already said that if he would play like he did in the WC as often as we need him to, I would be okay with keeping him.  See you don’t want to talk about that though because it shows actual fair minded evaluation not stanning.   
×
×
  • Create New...