Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

After Cooling Down, The Overarching Question Remains: How Does Shula Keep His Job?


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Ahh the " look what he have to work with" card... But mostly the same players were a top  O  the two season before Shula.

 

We need more talent on O no doubt about it... But the players already on the team has shown the can produce.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some here require that the Panthers have a coach that 'needs to be fired'. Shula fills that need currently, so until another 'bad hire' shows up, Shula can't get the boot. 

 

Regarding play calling, I do find all those redzone attempts to shove it up the middle disturbing. 2 TD's instead of one FG would have been a big game changer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Winning can hide some of your weaknesses, and that might be the case with our offense.  Our offense was decent at times, but not nearly explosive or consistent enough. Even if you think Mike Shula does a good job, I hope no one thinks our offense isn't a weakness for us.  Consistent playoff teams dont have offenses that rank near the bottom.  So we need to fix something. Everyone has been saying forever that we need a big physical target. I like Greg Olsen a lot, but i wish he was more physical than he is, not even just as a blocker, but as a route runner too.  We just need a few more reliable weapons.

 

This is what we need to make the next step.  Our offense needs a lot of improvement.  Oline and WR, should be some of the top priorites.

 

We did drop off offensively from the last two years though, and you could argue that we have better receivers this year.  So maybe we need a new OC too..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing to ask is even if we had a formidable right line and weapons, is this offense an effective one to use Cam Newton in? 

 

I just don't like our playbook.  It's not even about execution but the actual plays that our drafted up for this team.  We're clearly trying to be this mistake free/methodical/traditional style offense, yet we don't run misdirections, counters, and screens enough or at the right times.  And the routes our receivers have to run our either terribly executed, poorly planned, or a combo of both.  The lack of plays where a WR/TE catches the ball in stride on a slant or post is telling.  We just aren't able to score at will and that's a huge part of being succesful in today's NFL: scoring when you need to.     

 

I like what it seems they're trying to do, but really don't like our OC or offensive personel outside of Cam, Kalil, our left OL and Tolbert.   This coming offseason will tell a lot about the offense Gettleman and Ron want to build.  

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivera's not going to fire Shula, and Gettleman is far more likely to prefer Shula's style of offense to someone like Chud's given his background with the Giants and the way their offense is run. I seriously think anyone looking for Gettleman to push Shula out will be severely disappointed.

 

So, you can either choose to look at the film and see some playcalling failings mixed in with some poor player execution and accept both can stand to grow and improve but neither are hopeless, and in fact have done a better than expected job given a dearth of offensive talent outside of our lone elite talent, or. . .

 

You can make a million fire Shula threads all offseason and choose to be pessimistic over a 12-4 season that was a few poor flags, defensive gaffes and offensive miscues from continuing.

 

I'll stick with the former, since it's the only viable option.

 

FP, we know we have no say in what happens.  It's just a medium for us to express our opinions, and by overwhelming majority, the fanbase wants to upgrade the offensive coordinator.

 

Of course our opinions are of little consequence to the actual inner workings and personnel decisions, but it's worth discussing.  Otherwise, none of us would be here.

 

A couple of counterpoints to your post though.

 

Agreed, GMan is much more inclined to go with a conventional-style offense over what Chud was running.  But, as I said, there is a happy medium, and most likely, his name is Norv Turner.  All of the downfield fun without all of the cutesy gimmicks.  And to your point about his history and the offensive philosophy while in New York...  Yes, it was conventional, but they didn't handicap Eli either.  In fact, it could be argued that Eli was given a little too much autonomy in their offense at times.  He was allowed to sling it everywhere -  and AGAIN, there aren't many, if any, QBs in the NFL that have Cam's ability (in both running and passing).  If you can let Eli erratically throw it all over the field, you certainly can find an OC to let Cam do his thing in the passing game.

 

Obviously, I don't expect the organization to make a move.  From the top to the bottom, we have a loyalty problem to a fault, more often than not.  It's just my conclusion that Shula greatly hindered us offensively, and we could've been much more dominant had he opened things up.  I don't foresee him making any tweaks going into next year either.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For Shula to keep his job, DG needs to sign every possible offensive upgrade he can afford.

So if we have good starter quality talent at every position, then we'll be okay? It doesn't work like this.

Good coaches can maneuver around deficiencies on their team. It's why people look so silly whenever they try to defend Shula by loudly prattling "EXECUTION" or "BUT BYRON BELL"

Shula does not understand the strengths and weaknesses of his team, he doesn't understand the strengths and weakness of opposing teams, and he doesn't understand how to respond to the changing tide of a game. And he sure as heck doesn't know to let your QB keep winning you a game when he's hot but I guess that go along with not knowing your strengths and weaknesses.

It's still inconceivable how we dropped so far offensively with virtually the exact same offensive personnel.

Shula does not deserve to reap the benefits of having a team filled with great players at every single position. That isn't his job. His job is to be able to make the offense go without them. Any poster on this board could go out and look like a don coryellesque revolutionary with 11 good players on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Seems to me Shulas playcalling has been a result more from what our O is capable of and more importantly, has shown they can accomplish rather than as some are suggesting holding back/bad calls.

 

We can debate all we want, but ill go back some pages to the beginning, when some said we were a 12-4 team based on DEFENSE, and then another replied that before Shula our offense was SOO much better. Let us be reminded that the offense before Shula was not a product of great playcalling as much as it was backed by Cam being the player he is. If we have to credit the defense for the 12-4 season, then we have to give Cam the vast majority of the credit for what we were prior to Shula. In short, other than Cam...what is the difference between the O of last, and the O of this year?

 

Shula isnt going anywhere before next season. He is just as much of a part of a 12-4 season as anyone else, and considering this season compared to the last few, we are FAR better off than we have been

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FP, we know we have no say in what happens.  It's just a medium for us to express our opinions, and by overwhelming majority, the fanbase wants to upgrade the offensive coordinator.

 

Of course our opinions are of little consequence to the actual inner workings and personnel decisions, but it's worth discussing.  Otherwise, none of us would be here.

 

A couple of counterpoints to your post though.

 

Agreed, GMan is much more inclined to go with a conventional-style offense over what Chud was running.  But, as I said, there is a happy medium, and most likely, his name is Norv Turner.  All of the downfield fun without all of the cutesy gimmicks.  And to your point about his history and the offensive philosophy while in New York...  Yes, it was conventional, but they didn't handicap Eli either.  In fact, it could be argued that Eli was given a little too much autonomy in their offense at times.  He was allowed to sling it everywhere -  and AGAIN, there aren't many, if any, QBs in the NFL that have Cam's ability (in both running and passing).  If you can let Eli erratically throw it all over the field, you certainly can find an OC to let Cam do his thing in the passing game.

 

Obviously, I don't expect the organization to make a move.  From the top to the bottom, we have a loyalty problem to a fault, more often than not.  It's just my conclusion that Shula greatly hindered us offensively, and we could've been much more dominant had he opened things up.  I don't foresee him making any tweaks going into next year either.

 

 

I wouldn't mind Norv coming on as an offensive consultant. It'd be an easy way to keep him in the coaching ranks without supplanting Shula, and given Shula's reputation of working well with the offensive staff and seeking input he would hopefully take all the help he could get.

 

As for Cam slinging it all over the field, his footwork needs to improve in its consistency before he could be trusted to run a Peyton-style offense. I love Cam as much as the next but it's the truth and something I fully expect to be vastly improved next season, just as he took a big step from last year to this one. And having some better receiving options would tremendously help too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...