Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we ditch Dwill and Jstew?


Camsfanclub

Recommended Posts

You could make Williams a June 1 cut and not need to invest in the draft in a RB this year.

Cam, Tolbert, Stewart, Barner.....

While Williams creates dead money he would also create cap room to sign a quality starter at a position of need (a mercenary)

The only problem is that Stewart and Barner did nothing.  So you are left with a quarterback and fullback.  Then again weren't you the one advocating for the read option with Cam as a primary weapon this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with our run game is NOT our RB 's...it is the OL.

The only issue with our RB's are the bad contracts they have

Is the OL really that bad? Gross is a stud still and so is Kalil, getting the guards back will really help. Bell is serviceable but nothing worth writing home about. Dwill just doesnt have the burst he used to, hes hit the wall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barner got 3 carries being ran like you would a FB. That means nothing about what he is or isn't.

Tolbert being the best RB is the perfect reasoning to make Williams a June 1 cut. Essentially trade Williams out and add a starter at a position of need (cut him and use the cap space created to hire mercenary).

Wiliams needs to take another pay cut or go. Stewart has us by the balls.

Tolbert would be a fine replacement if we were dumping Stewart but we aren't.  The problem is that the only guy we can get rid of  based on dead cap would be Williams.  Tolbert and Williams are very different players and not interchangeable.  

 

 

Williams didn't take a pay cut last year and won't again. Why is that people think restructuring means a pay cut when it means converting a portion of his salary to a signing bonus not reducing what we pay him. All that goes down is his cap hit.

 

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/panthers-save-3-2-million-cap-space-restructuring-121345904.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could make Williams a June 1 cut and not need to invest in the draft in a RB this year.

Cam, Tolbert, Stewart, Barner.....

While Williams creates dead money he would also create cap room to sign a quality starter at a position of need (a mercenary)

 

Of the two RBs, Stewart is the one I assume most would prefer to see go due to his constant health problems. Unfortunately his contract situation makes that a virtual impossibility. DeAngelo isn't the same guy who got 1500 yards, but at least he's always on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forget the RB talk guys.

 

Retirement by Stewart woudl be nice, but I don't look for it.  Injury settlement?

 

DWill can still play if the oline can open a hole or two.

 

But these guys are gonna get paid, period, whether on our team or not. 

 

Why do you think we have been bitching about it so long.  Oh and by the way, for all the "double trouble ain't going nowhere" guys, from a couple years back?   thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

contracts or players, i wish we could and draft kadeem carey from Arizona in the 2nd.

 

Stewart is my favorite player on the team, but I would be SOOOOOOOOO on board with anything that ended up with Ka'deem ending up a Panther.

 

I'm an Arizona alum and was hoping he'd come back to school not only for my Wildcats, but hoping that after another year we could get rid of Stew without as much of a hit and then take Ka'deem with the 32 pick in the draft.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...