Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2yr Gamble


rippadonn

Would you sign Gamble to a two year deal?  

60 members have voted

  1. 1. 2yr Gamble?



Recommended Posts

Since we're supposed to be preparing for a Super Bowl run next season on a budget, let's talk about home town discounts once again. Since Chris Gamble was released the secondary has been a target. Deservedly so.

I'd like to see us finally draft a WR, double up on Oline and draft another TE. What would make that possible is shoring up the CB position with a veteran. Chris GAMBLE still had a lot left in the tank when Gettlemagic released him. C'mon Riverboat how bout another GAMBLE?

What say you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Gamble was great here but he's retired and has no interest in coming back. It's very hard to come back at full speed after a year off from football, especially given he was injured the year before that too if I recall right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
    • Depends if they see the writing on the wall with their roster and contracts and decide to bite the bullet and begin a complete rebuild and roster overhaul.  I have no clue why some franchises (IE us) refuse to do this and keep half assing trying to win 8 games or so.  Do it correctly, take your lumps and build a contender.  We shall see what loomis decides.
    • Each team plays 17 games.  I do not see why they don't just have each team play one international game per year.  Neutral site game, 8 home, 8 away.    
×
×
  • Create New...