Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So who is going to test drive a $60k Kia?

Happy Panther

By Happy Panther,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Niner National Newbie

Niner National

Posted
Posted

Their goal with this is probably the same that Hyundai had with the Equus. Not to turn a profit, but to prove they can build a car that can compete in quality with a luxury car.

 

Hyundai only built like 7,000 Equus cars, and they did so at a loss, but profitability was never their goal. It was to improve perception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

Their goal with this is probably the same that Hyundai had with the Equus. Not to turn a profit, but to prove they can build a car that can compete in quality with a luxury car.

 

Hyundai only built like 7,000 Equus cars, and they did so at a loss, but profitability was never their goal. It was to improve perception.

Not true.

 

They only imported about that many to the US.  The Equus has been made for Asia for years.  I traveled to Korea numerous times on business and the high end car services were all using them instead of BMW's or Mercedes....and this was several years before they started selling them here.

 

They are a fantastic car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Dark Knight

Guest Dark Knight

Posted
Posted

Kia vehicles are just as good as Ford, Chevrolet, Honda, Toyota, etc. Just like all the high end vehicles made by those companies are just as nice as anything made by BMW or Mercedes.

Vehicles are no different than clothing, shoes, electronics, etc. It's all about the name & brand recognition. I could name 100 sets of headphones that are cheaper than Dre Beats (which suck for the money) & have them beat in quality 1,000x over. It's all about status.

Most people would take a BMW with 150,000 miles over a brand new Kia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shufdog Community Regular

Shufdog

Posted
Posted

We have a Kia Soul and really like it.

I'm not buying any $60k car from any manufacturer so it's moot for me.

If I was in the market I'd consider a Kia though...

 

My Mom has a Kia Sportage, it's a very nice car! I've not found anything wrong with it and she's had it for several years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

I just don't see that many older models of either Hyundai's or Kia's on the road... despite the warranties both offer. 

 

 

You do realize that Hyundai upgraded their product only about 7 years ago?  Or that they have some of the highest safety, quality, and approval ratings in the industry?

 

Nah...betting you don't.  We will just chalk this up as another in a long line of ill informed and flat our wrong posts that you make every day.

 

Carry on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...