Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fox presser


beasonfanclub

Recommended Posts

Fox: "... at the end of the day it was a successful season. 15-4 is not real shabby."

Wow that takes some fugging balls to say. That game will be remembered forever as the biggest beat down in Super Bowl history and you got the cahonhas to say "not too shabby"?!

Like him as a person but holy crap I'm glad Fox isn't our coach anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not a failure, but when you go to the Superbowl and get blown out that badly, and you just went 13-3 the year before, you can't call it a success.

As a matter of fact, I feel better as a panther fan than I would as a broncos fan given how the season panned out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it's just me but, people are so ready to jump down his throat. That season was not "Shabby" at all. The Super Bowl was horrible, yes we know that.  But for everyone to act as if he should've said "Yes this season was a failure" is crazy. I understand the Super Bowl or Bust mentality but come on...only 1 team wins it in the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
    • In 6 games, we've only had 6 hurries??? ... that can't be accurate
×
×
  • Create New...