Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Better player: Charles Johnson or Greg Hardy?


El Chingon

Recommended Posts

CJ provides a veteran leadership that has played a vital role in elevating the defense's mentality..

 

Greg Hardy is that crazy mofuger everyone wants on their team and has the ability to not only anchor the DL facing the LT but also versatile enough to play anywhere on DL.

 

CJ has that ability as well...

 

 

you want both..  if you had to choose then it depends on if you think Hardy can be groomed to replace CJ's leadership if you side on his youth...

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CJ. Remember the year before this past? 12.5 and 7 forced fumbles? That is fuging crazy. Very stout against the run, I think hardy is on the same level as him there though

Hardy has a knack for coming up with insane stats in a couple games. CJ is more consistent. Hardy is a fuging monster though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the key to Hardy's value. Big Money is consistent. Hardy will go quiet for weeks in the pass rush department. Someone is going to offer several trucks of money to Hardy, and they will get an excellent DE, but he will disappear at times.

Sent from my VS980 4G using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...