Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kouandijo vs. Moses vs. Richardson vs. Turner


MedellinHeel

Recommended Posts

if Getty really is serious about BPA, we;re probably looking at A  DB in round 1.

 

Moses for example has a second round grade, although he fall to us in the back of the second round.

 

If a DB with a true first round grade falls to us, that's probably who'll we will take.

 

I'm thinking that they pretty much know that the the 3 or 4 DBs worth taking in the first will be gone.  We've signed Harper, and brought Thomas in for a visit. With the talk of possibly signing Cason, I am fairly sure that WR or OL is going to be the pick.

Gettleman believes in using FA to free him in the draft to pick the BPA.  His plans at picking up a WR in FA (that's worth half a damn as a veteran presence) has gone awry. And we have yet to bring in the first veteran O-lineman (I believe), and Donald Penn was probably the surest thing left (depending upon if you believe in Oher) until he signed yesterday, so to me everything is pointing at WR or OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really don't want to draft a OL in the first if he can't play LT. I guess were just taking a gamble no matter what we do.

 

Unless the staff feels confident about Cyrus's knee I don't think we will draft a OT in the 1st. 

 

Ton of OT value in the second (Moses, Richardson, Turner, etc) 

 

At the same time though there are question marks with the WR's projected at 28 i.e. Cooks, OBJ, Benjamin, etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best WR available,

Best T available,

Best WR available,

Best T available.

That's how I hope our draft goes. We can see what we have in Dockery and Lester and some of the other young secondary guys, as well as add secondary support through FA with guys like Cason or Thomas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What concerns me about Billy Turner is the level of competition.

 

So long as his measurables are there i.e. size, quickness, strength I am not much concerned about that as a coach can teach him. Besides he did well at the señor bowl and when they played schools from major conferences. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

lol ok

 

 

 
Id love the Turner + Flemming combo. Not sure how I feel about WRs that I am bigger than in the 1st. 
 
 

 

 

I personally prefer Beckham, Adams, and Matthews at WR with Matthews being the most ready off the bat.  I'm still as high on JM as I was before bowl season.  He just gets it done.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The OL has certainly been better than the trainwreck it was three or four years ago. As far as competitiveness let's apply some realism and clarity here. Quite a bit of the competitiveness in 2025 came from the defensive side of the ball which gave up the most points in league history the year before and was one of the bottom 5 units in terms of salary cap allocation for 2025 while the OL was top 3. We had the 26th passing offense last year. And if not for a herculean couple of games from Rico Dowdle we don't back our way into the division title or make the playoffs because we went 4-6 in our final ten games including being swept by the Saints who were starting a rookie 2nd round pick most of us mercilessly mocked when they selected him. In conclusion yes we've seen a difference. The question now is will the investment pay off the way we want. But the only way that happens is if we field a top 15 offense. If we can't even crack the top 20 then there need to be some very warm seats across the board. And I would hope just about anyone here should agree with that.
    • These Spurs are lowkey loaded.  If healthy, they could win it all this year (#2 in the West right now). I still think we’ve gotta keep Kalk on Wemby; he’s not getting completely dominated like every other NBA center.
    • Am I the only one who doesn't understand this fan bases infatuation with adding a high end TE? Especially when we have some bigger bodies in T-Mac and Coker who can slide into the slot at times and provide the big dependable target over the middle that most teams use their TE for. I mean, sure, it would be nice to have one of those elite TE's, but I feel like that's a position your better off going cheap with a committee who each bring something different to the table while spending our cap room on the more important positions. I like the potential we saw from Evans this year, Sanders could be a best if he can stay healthy, and Tremble has improved as well.  Just feels like spending high draft picks or cap space on other needs and more important positions is a better use of our resources than splashing on a TE in the draft or FA. Are those guys on the level of the Bowers or McBride's of the world?  Of course not, but we also are paying a fraction of the cost on our TE room than they are, and we're able to use that money for other needs.
×
×
  • Create New...