Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josh Norris will be on WFNZ at 910


Ruff

Recommended Posts

also, what T, DB, G, TE and WR's would have to be off the board to make Ealy BPA?

Exactly I could see if we didn't have as many needs or the draft was thin at our positions of need. But none of these are true. We have a lot of needs before DE or D line. And this draft is full( by everybody assessment) of our needs. Bpa has to fall within our area of need before it goes to positions of strength.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i understand but it would certainly have me question what their expectations are for this coming year

 

I think it was Kevin Greene's thread where he suggested that we overachieved.  I actually think we did.  We could have easily gone 9-7 or 10-6.  Even still, this would have been an improvement.   I loved everything about last year and think we do it again.  But we're not quite there yet.  We are sooooooo close and that's what's so hard for most fan to recognize (not you in particular).   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Umm the QB, MLB, and DT positions you are talking about, will be locked up long term. You are missing the point. No way we can keep both CJ and Hardy. One will be gone after next year. Again, we have to plan 5 years down the road.

This would be a good point if you didn't have young depth behind them like you do.

How much did we drop off when CJ got hurt last season??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be surprised if G-Man did draft Ealy. The Giants DL was dominant because the front office made their strength a juggernaut. Yeah, it's overkill but in a pass-happy league pass rushers are essential.

so are pass catchers and OL. probably moreso. we are set on the DL. you can't say that about WR and OL.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would be a good point if you didn't have young depth behind them like you do.

How much did we drop off when CJ got hurt last season??

 

I agree all the way.  But it's a must that our d-line is top notch.  That's why Hardy is back.  Any drop off would show how weak our secondary is.  I trust the development of our young DEs, but would be mad if we kept that strength a strength.  And to your point, hardy is the only real "1st round" DE talent on the roster.  CJ took time to develop and turned out great.  So I have no doubts that the next man will step up after when needed.  If that man is on the roster, then so be it.  Again, I personally wouldn't have added DE in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Umm the QB, MLB, and DT positions you are talking about, will be locked up long term.  You are missing the point.  No way we can keep both CJ and Hardy.  One will be gone after next year.  Again, we have to plan 5 years down the road.  

agree

 

why this is so difficult for some people to grasp is beyond me

 

all I can say is WOW!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was Kevin Greene's thread where he suggested that we overachieved. I actually think we did. We could have easily gone 9-7 or 10-6. Even still, this would have been an improvement. I loved everything about last year and think we do it again. But we're not quite there yet. We are sooooooo close and that's what's so hard for most fan to recognize (not you in particular).

I don't agree with this either.

Before last season we were a 6-10 and 7-9 team that lost "every" close game. Remember before last season Rivera and Cam were 2 and 14 in games that was a td or less differential. Also remember most of those games we had the lead in the 4th. If we had won just half of those games we're looking at a team that avg. 10 wins a year. So I don't see the overachieveing thing. I see a team that was getting better every season and finally caught the breaks it wasn't getting (at all) in prior season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so are pass catchers and OL. probably moreso. we are set on the DL. you can't say that about WR and OL.

I see almost a perfect situation at Dline right now.

1. 2 young Stars in there prime.

2. Young developing talent behind them.

3. Surrounded by young talent at DT and Lb.

I wouldn't understand adding another player to that when there are other abundantly evident holes on the team.

If they didn't tag Hardy and filled the other holes with his money then I could see this as a option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...