Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We Have More Cap Space Than You Think


Recommended Posts

Financially, this has been a tough offseason for the Panthers. We've had our backs pressed against the salary cap and have watched some pretty alluring free agents sign elsewhere time after time. Fear not, however. Gettleman is setting us up to have a nice bit of cap room. 

 

Currently, the NFL Salary Cap is $133.0M. We have $6.0M in 2013 Cap Rollover and lost $0.3M in adjustments. 

 

This means our adjusted Salary Cap is $138.7M. For comparison's sake, New Orleans' adjusted Cap is $132.8M. 

 

We are currently carrying $17.8M in dead money—thanks Jon Beason ($8.0M), Jordan Gross ($5.6M), and James Anderson ($2.8M), but most importantly Marty Hurney. 

 

We are also carrying approximately $134.2M in salary among our top 51 contracts—what counts against the cap. I say approximately because I estimated DeCoud's cap hit based on his average salary. 

 

This all calculates out to $4.5M in Cap Space. If we cut Godfrey post-June 1 (looking more and more likely), we will have $9.6M in Cap Space. 

 

Resigning Hardy long-term would likely give us ~$12.5M in 2014 Cap Space. 

 

$12.5M in Cap Space sounds very nice right now. It would give us plenty of room to sign our rookies and begin looking forward to extending Cam. 

 

Cheers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I do like the post and like the logic any Huddler posting about "Cap Space" is read with a giant block of salt..

In reference to cap space...we have professionals that are working on it!

When we drop the dead money from Beason, Gross, Anders we will be fine...then when its doable to drop the HB contracts its sweet extentions for Cam and Keuchley...and soon Star..but I think CJ's contract will either be gone or redone by then.

We will not have a lot of cap room after the extentions so expect similar free agencey results i the next 4-5 seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we have basically enough to sign our draft picks at the moment. Good.

I am pretty sure there is a rookie alottment seperate from the Cap space. Bc of tiered salaries of where a team pick. Something like that. I would look but you have the internet as well.

Aww shucks here it is anyway...

http://overthecap.com/initial-nfl-rookie-pool-estimates/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It ruffles my jimmies every time I'm reminded we have to pay Gross so much to abandon us.

Umm we choose this scenerio. We voided his contract for relief last year. He would probably still be on the team if not for Gettleman voiding his contract. Not saying that as a criticism, just fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...