All Activity

$325,996,438 2020- 54,072,638 2021- 53,966,463 2022- 52,457,843 2023- 62,169,404 2024- 73,242,553 2025- 30,087,537

Damn autocorrect. How it makes the leap from "Hankton" to "Hamilton" I have no idea

Memory must be slipping man! Its Karl Stone Hands Hankton! Before the days of Greg Olsen you knew if the ball got thrown to 88 it was punt time

Facts. I think virtually everyone has accepted this and is trying to cut their deals behind the scenes. NC legislature will probably try to tie NCSU to UNC because they pretty much know that NCSU will basically become NCSU if they don't. Their only hope of keeping NCSU relevant is to try to tie them to UNC.

How long does anyone typically last? NFL = Not For Long. Bottom line is we need good players. And if he's better than who we have on an actual football field, he should probably be out there. We'll see how it goes.

How long does that type typically last in the league? Regardless i dont think he is that kind of player, he will get (or has already gotten) his poo together.

As an NC State fan and alumnus with nostalgia aside, this just means we are going to be bad to mediocre and play against different teams.

He could also be one of those guys that doesn’t show up with great conditioning but he’s a player on Sunday. Those do exist.

I'm curious how much playing time he gets since they wanted to put him on the PS and get his conditioning right before moving him to the 53.

I may have staggered by it a time or 2 in the 90s. I miss those days.

Is it really all that shocking one of the young Manning kids isn't living up to the immense hype associated with his name and family tree only? More of a sign of the times from my perspective. Newer generations aren't built the same. He's probably been told this and that about who he's supposed to be all his life. Maybe he'll clamp down and work on his fundamentals and become a better player for it or maybe mediocre or mid is just his ceiling regardless of who he is related to. Probably best to stop trying so hard to put kids like this on a pedestal.

lol true but you’ve been 11-2 just three times, all under the spurrier years and highest rank was what? 4th? If any school wants to even think about the playoffs from ACC the last place they want to be is in SEC. And they all know that, that’s why they settled instead of paying the buyout which would have netted more money in the long run.

Unless you’re Rob Pelinka (Mark Williams)

Nice, fat suit KB 2.0 incoming

Back issues…not good for a $200 mil guy.

Without looking at the roster, probably DJ Johnson or one of the waiver pickups.

The only thing keeping the ACC alive is the Grant of Rights deal that has a massive buyout but that number is dropping each year. There is no real world option where the ACC can get a better tv package. The top schools will go SEC or BIG for all that money. The leftovers will either form some low rent option or get absorbed by big 12 and big east. It sucks but the ACC is toast.

Perfect - sounds like a good chance to get another Nick Scott on our team.... We will have the best special teams in the league while letting every team we play throw it deep against us

based and dopamine-pilled

Hey if Cam Newton didn’t exist in 2010 we would have won the SEC!1!1!1!1

I think he could be a nice reliable 3rd down target. Let him find the soft spots in the defense. XL and TMac should handle the outside.

Much like Bryce though….not sure Hunter really fits Dave. So, just for the record it’s not me picking on Bryce with fit of scheme

Assuming you're genuinely confused and not feigning ignorance, it's worth reviewing those last two sentences that were originally quoted: In one breath, there is a declaration that there is "no justification". In the next, "there is a bit of nuance that shouldn't just be ignored." And then ended with, "should not be entertained." It reads like a contradictory "no excuses" sandwich that suggests that there is nuance because we're supposed to just look at the other players at their position when that's already being done? Then there's the contradiction of suggesting that nuance "shouldn't just be ignored" being followed by suggesting that nuance "should not be entertained." Hopefully that helps with us understanding one another better.