rebelrouser

He won't be a hall of famer. LOL. Not even close. Give us your picks and take him at 6.

Hell no. There are several disaster scenarios presenting themselves (like taking a qb at 6) and this is one of them.

And what would those players (Mahomes, Allen, Jackson, and Jones) be ranked in this qb class? No. 1. You don't take a qb at 6 in this draft. At best, you trade back and take a Corral or Howell who might end of being a Mahomes or Allen.

We simply cannot use pick 6 for a qb. No one in this class is worthy of that pick. Will one or more of them become NFL starters? Sure. Maybe one or two but it is a crap shoot of who that will be. We can simply sit back and telegraph the idea that we are going to take a qb at six knowing the pick is OT and let others sweat. Let's see what the Browns want to do when it looks like they will cut him, eat his salary, and let him go to Steelers. They will NOT let that happen because it will make them look really bad. We can get a really good deal for Baker if we are patient. If we miss out? Who cares. Take the OT and be ready to find a qb next year.

McShay during Alabama game Remember when he looked like he was strung out during the Alabama Miami game last year and then he took time off from ESPN to address his health? Something is odd. Not sure why he would burn these bridges considering the job he has.

That is a fair argument, but we are not likely to have the number 1 pick or be able to trade for someone like Wilson. QB's are a crap shoot and Darnold is not the answer. I would be willing to take a flyer on a Matt Corral or Sam Howell in the second round.

This would be an A+ draft for us but would require a good deal of luck. We probably couldn't trade down past Chargers at 17 and still get Pennington. A decent qb should be left for us in round 2 though.

1. not mobile but yet quick to run at the first sign of pressure (this will be a good look with our crap oline--he will be as bad or worse than Darnold under pressure; 2. small hands will lead to fumbles when his slow ass gets sacked; 3. lacking arm strength and ability to stretch the field; and 4. he's 24, had one good year in a weak conference, and has a low ceiling that will mean he will be mediocre at best. He is Darnold 2.0. Should we use a no. 6 pick to clone Sam Darnold?

6????? Not one of these guys is worthy of the 6 pick and sure as hell not a guy w/ a weird knee issue. Would much rather have Corral, but i'm an Ole Miss fan that watched him play a lot and he is not worth a 6 pick either.

What? He does not remotely have the potential Burrow did. Pickett will allow us to double up on mediocre qb's who can't do anything behind a poor oline.

Just don't take a qb at six.

If Neal or Ekwonu are there at 6 then take them. If not, trade back. Howell, Ridder, and Strong are just as likely to be NFL qb's as Corral, Willis, and Pickett. This is a very unimpressive qb class. Not sure why everyone loves Fields. He is no better than Darnold.

Corral--threw a ton of int's two years ago; lots of injuries. Just don't see him as being worth no. 6. Picket--small hands and a pretty low ceiling not making him worth a no. 6 pick Willis--too short; hasn't proven he is ready mentally to go through projections; weak competition in an rpo offense; highest ceiling and highest probability to be a complete bust. Not worth no. 6 pick. I would trade back and take a lt w/ first pick and a qb like the kid from UNC with the 2nd round pick obtained in the trade.

Trade back to gain a 3rd or even 2nd if someone wants to move enough. This is a deep class not a top heavy one so we need to make up some picks to fill all of these holes. Take the best LT you can find in round one. Pick up a guard/center and veteran qb in free agency. Round 1 Charles Cross/Ekwonu/Kenyon Green/Raimann/Pennington....depending on how far back we go. As you can see, deep LT class and lets hope Cross or Ekwonu fall. The below scenario would be ideal" Panthers Get No. 14 overall No. 46 overall No. 97 overall Ravens Get No. 6 overall You have a deal

There is a reason he is talking about football to clueless fans rather than coaching in the NFL: .480 winning percentage.

Trade back. Pretty deep OT class and the qb's are not worth a no. 6 pick.

Dabo? Dabo is an idiot who is a snake oil salesman elite recruiter. He would be an abject failure in the NFL where you can't just out talent your opponent and win a couple of tough games a hear. He can't coach worth a damn and would be worse than Urban.

Can we trade him for an olineman? He's a spoiled brat.

I could see 9-8. We still need some roster building but are off to a good start. LT is the only huge need so we can go with a lot of best available and build some depth.

They quoted him last night as saying he was glad to end up where he was wanted. B*&$%h please, it was a business decision. JC doesn't go down, and we never trade you. Have some awareness of football decisions. We're supposed to keep an extra tight end w/ a big hole at cb?

having such a slow start? Benching him this week on fantasy. Might drop him all together.

Not any more. Must have been ped's.

He's suffering behind a poor oline but its not like we have a good one either. I'll take Darnold over him.

Gettleman sucks. Barkley? Don't take a rb w/ first pick trade down. Daniel Jones? Might be ok but shouldn't you have a oline and weapons for your new qb? Andrew Thomas? How did you get the worst of the olineman from this class by taking the first one?

What a dumbass. I bet he didn't offer nearly enough money, which is dumb becasue: