Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

D. Newton picks Ealy based on Kiper & McShay's latest mock, & G-man's thinking.


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Further proof that this poo is all speculation.  One thing about it though, if there is a run on receivers, then Ealy could happen.

 

Gettleman also said he wouldn't reach for a player, meaning he wouldn't use a first-round pick on a player the Panthers have rated as a second-rounder. 

He also said he would take the best player available, suggesting he would take a cornerback, pass-rushing end or even another defensive tackle -- Carolina used its top two picks on defensive tackles last season -- if that is how the board fell. 

So based on the Kiper Jr. and McShay mock, I'm going with Missouri defensive endKony Ealy at No. 28 as insurance in case the Panthers can't get a long-term deal with Greg Hardy. Or simply because he adds another weapon to the league's second-ranked defense. 

 

LINK

 

That would be a shot heard around the NFL (especially in Hardy's ears).

 

IF it happens, I am not going to belabor it in my mind, though I would almost say we would have to get a WR and OT in the second and third round if we want to keep a semblance of balance and defenses honest.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that happened I could still see us going OT in both rounds 2 and 3 though.   I wouldn't know what to say for our WR corps, except for maybe Rice and Holmes.  Maybe a Hardy trade for a few picks.  

 

I still have a Denarius Moore trade in the back of my mind...well, maybe not quite the back.

 

Basically, we'd be in a pickle of sorts, but I'm sure G-man would create a plan---at least in the long term (as in focusing on WR in 2015). Who the hell knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't forget about your franchise player. It was said this AM on the radio. We neglected our franchise player in FA by letting every receiver on the team walk. We started making up for it with guys who have ability but are not necessarily going to be big time difference makers.

But you can't neglect Cam in this draft by not adding weapons. I really have a hard time thinking that 7 WRs and 5-6 OTs are going in the first. Personally, I think someone is going to be there for us to take. I think Martin is going really high in all of these mocks. Not everyone is going to take a tackle in the first round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This part I could go with...

 

Thursday night's mock had Carolina taking Tennessee offensive tackle Ja'Wuan James in the second round at No. 60 and North Dakota State tackle Billy Turner in the third round at No. 92.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...