Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fall of the QBs -Trading Down


Recommended Posts

I was listening to NFL Network last night (Monday morning EST) and I got the impression that some of these QBs might drop out of the first round.  Also that some of these teams might want to trade up from the early second round into the first to ensure they get a QB. 

 

This would be a prime spot for one of these teams to trade up.  We would obtain an extra pick(s) somewhere and still get a similar value.

 

I would definitely do this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im guessing between houston, jacksonville, cleveland, oakland, tampa, minnesota, and potentially tennessee, st louis, and cincy - everyone will get their guy between the big four QBs. and if they dont they arent going to try scrambling by trading up to get plan B.

 

i'm also guessing a blue goose DL or one of those 10 WR/OT will be there for the picking at 28 and we're not gonna chance losing out on them by trading back 5+ picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Jax would be the prime target for us to trade with, in my mind anyway.  Everyone might be surprised with several of the named QB's still on the board that a guy like Tom Savage jumps in front of some guys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've also heard that if certain QB's fall to pick #31or #29, Denver or New England, either are rumored to possibly take one in the 1st to start grooming for the future exit of Manning or Brady. Could just be a smokescreen but the possibility might be enough for one of the early 2nd round teams to want to get in front of New England. Good for us and I would do it without hesitation. The talent level aavailable at 28 should still be there at 33 - 38 if need be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If only one or two QBs are gone by 26, we could definitely emerge as a trade partner if someone in the 2nd wants to ensure themselves Carr, Bridgewater, Bortles, etc.  I think Manziel goes in R1 but if he's somehow available at 28, you gotta think that would be the most appealing scenario for other teams.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking this is a likely scenario if any of the top 3 are sitting there when we pick. If we got and early to mid 2nd and another early to mid 3rd that would be absolutely amazing. 4 starters right there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be for it, if we get a third. All depends on Cleveland, if they take Johnny at 4, other QBs might fall and Panthers get a call. Otherwise, every team will try and get ahead of Cleveland at 26, so 25 will be the trade down spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read on PFT the other day that several teams have told Bridgewater they will trade into the mid to late 20's to take him (I'll have to look for the link). Honestly, I think this is hoping to be a very good draft for us. Two things will work in our favor. 1. QB's that everyone likes, but unsure of drafting high. This could mean a trade back scenario or teams freak out if one or two go early causing them to pass on better players. The problem I see with the trade back scenario is I don't know how open G-man would be to it. He's consistently talked about the "process." I remember a while ago he said something about the dangers of trading picks. At the time, everyone assumed he meant trading up. He may have meant either way. The Panthers staff has spent the past 4 months or so looking at pick number 28 and doing their research on projections for that pick. If you trade back, it's puts you in the unknown of sorts. You may have to take chances on players you know less about. Just a thought. G-man seems like the type who believes in hard work and his team's research.

The other thing that may help us is the fact that our needs are two of the deepest positions in the draft. I wonder if teams will pass on WR's and LT's for other positions knowing they can get talent in later rounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...