Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Massive ocean discovered near Earth core


PandaPancake

Recommended Posts

I was just looking around for something to read and came across this:

 

 

A reservoir of water three times the volume of all the oceans has been discovered deep beneath the Earth's surface. The finding could help explain where Earth's seas came from.

 

The water is hidden inside a blue rock called ringwoodite that lies 700 kilometres underground in the mantle, the layer of hot rock between Earth's surface and its core.

The huge size of the reservoir throws new light on the origin of Earth's water. Some geologists think water arrived in comets as they struck the planet, but the new discovery supports an alternative idea that the oceans gradually oozed out of the interior of the early Earth.

 

Source: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn25723-massive-ocean-discovered-towards-earths-core.html#.U5rLJ_mwIlQ

 

I love living in this time when scientific discoveries are made at a pace that any one single person can keep up with.

 

But if that isn't enough to amaze you, two years ago they spotted a rogue planet:

 

 

 

While the Kepler spacecraft’s mission to discover Earth-like planets orbiting other stars continues to produce results, astronomers have found what is likely to be a planet that is not gravitationally bound to any star. The rogue planet, called CFBDSIR2149, is around 100 light years from our solar system, making it the closest free-floating planetary mass yet discovered. Its relative proximity, coupled with the lack of a bright star in its vicinity, has allowed researchers to study its atmosphere in great detail, which should help provide a better understanding of exoplanets that do orbit stars.

 

Source: http://www.gizmag.com/rogue-planet-cfbdsir2149/25028/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you're saying Poseidon doesn't live there?

Prove it, big shot!

Sent from my iPhone while admiring feet using CarolinaHuddle

 

If he can live in a microscopic bead of water that exists between the microscopic grains of a mineral, I think the Greeks greatly overstated his significance is all I'm saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's definitely encouraging to know that we have enormous reserves of water, though. Because the surface of Earth really doesn't have that much. Sure it covers 70% of the Earth, but it's actually spread pretty thin given its relative depth. If you took all the water in the world and formed it into a ball, the ball would be less than 800 miles across.

 

1926422227_1398389509.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The government's been hiding this information for the public for years, but if any of you sheeple looked at the gold bar in these here ancient Incan doubloons, you'd see that it's actually soggy ringwoodite being held by a lizard person upon closer examination

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you misunderstand what I mean by "significantly better than Bryce Young." That gets you entry into the top 30 NFL starting QB's. Not sure if you have seen that group recently, but it's not a strong one the further down that list you go. Murray is a Tier 3 if not Tier 4 QB in my book.
    • Here is where you are… for purely the sake of arguing with me you are willing to suggest the 2025 Saints RBs might not be better than the 2025 Panthers RBs lol Saints have the 28th ranked rush attack.  We are top 10.   The Saints haven’t had a 100 yard rusher the entire season.  We have seen franchise best performances in a franchise known for running the rock. and see above for what our OL is also clearly better than the Saints.  Hell, Canales being forced into some mashups has often made it even stronger at times 
    • I am not saying there isn't truth to that but the economics and reality of the NFL are producing that. It's very hard to justify taking a guy in the 1st round, shelving him for years, having to make a contract extension and THEN hoping it all turns out okay. Not to mention, imagine that scenario after what we traded for Bryce. One thing is for certain, the QB desperation has led to bad 1st round QB picks for 15+ years now. That ain't new.  I think we need to decide on Bryce's future this offseason and we will have to. In my eyes, picking up the 5th year option is the "all-in" move for a two year period. That means you are committed to him in the medium term. Not the move I would personally make.  No matter what the decision is, I have been vocal about needing to bring in multiple QB's to improve that QB room for when Bryce falters again. How about just overall improving your team depth so that when it doesn't pan out, you at least have options on the roster? I don't feel like that is too much to ask and it's a valid bet hedge. 
×
×
  • Create New...