Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Depth Chart and potential signings

bLACKpANTHER

By bLACKpANTHER,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

bLACKpANTHER Proficient

bLACKpANTHER

Posted
Posted

PG: Kemba -- Roberts -- ???

SG: Lance -- Hendo -- Neal -- PJ

SF: MKG -- Taylor -- ???

PF: Williams -- Zeller -- Vonleh

C: Jefferson -- Biz -- ???

 

—I think we need another scoring SF to back up MKG, especially with the possibility of Taylor not recovering or going down with another injury.

—I also think we need another BIG, because outside of Al, Marvin and Biz- we don't have a lot of experience.

—I'm not too concerned with signing another PG because Lance can handle that job pretty well too.

 

Anyways, who is left on the market that can help us in the 2 areas I mentioned above?

 

SFs: Evan Turner, Shawn Marion, CDR, Xavier Henry, Michael Beasley

 

PF/Cs: Carlos Boozer, Andray Blatche, Ed Davis, Emeka Okafor, Andrew Bynum

 

My Votes:

SF: Evan Turner- he fits perfectly with Lance... pfffft, j/k
Give me some CDR for sure. He was great for us last year moving the ball around and scoring (in the clutch, i might add) when his number was called. We could always add some more 3pt scoring and he fits the bill better than anyone out there right now. He knows the system and Clifford trusts him. I would imagine for him to be scooped up here pretty soon.

 

PF/C: We might put a bid in on Boozer, but I think Andray Blatche could be so helpful to our BIG rotation. He played big minutes for Brooklyn the past few years. He's gritty like Stephenson is. He can play PF or C too. He is going to visit with Toronto today so this might be unrealistic if he gets signed later today, but he could be another very solid depth signing.

 

What say you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Care-Oh-Linuh Newbie

Care-Oh-Linuh

Posted
Posted

I like pargo as 3rd pg

My pick for SF: Beasley

The guy is young and has underrated talent. Rebounds well on top of reasonable point totals.

My pick for C: Ed Davis

Also young and underrated. He would be a steal IMO. He's been stashed behind vets his whole career but has always proven his worth when he gets those longer bench minutes. Potentially our starting PF/C if Vonleh or Zeller struggle in the future?

I like these picks because you'd get talent as good as some vets but would also continue to build for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rmoneyg35 Proficient

rmoneyg35

Posted
Posted

I like pargo as 3rd pg

My pick for SF: Beasley

The guy is young and has underrated talent. Rebounds well on top of reasonable point totals.

My pick for C: Ed Davis

Also young and underrated. He would be a steal IMO. He's been stashed behind vets his whole career but has always proven his worth when he gets those longer bench minutes. Potentially our starting PF/C if Vonleh or Zeller struggle in the future?

I like these picks because you'd get talent as good as some vets but would also continue to build for the future.

I honestly don't see why we don't try to get Davis if we can't get Boozer. Maybe he wants too much money? I really haven't watched him much in the pros but he has the prototypical body for a center since college.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Care-Oh-Linuh Newbie

Care-Oh-Linuh

Posted
Posted

I honestly don't see why we don't try to get Davis if we can't get Boozer. Maybe he wants too much money? I really haven't watched him much in the pros but he has the prototypical body for a center since college.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

When he got the opportunity to start in Toronto, he avg something like 17-10 with 2blk he has a secret talent that we need to grab immediately

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cbarrier90 Newbie

cbarrier90

Posted
Posted

Unless you move some of that logjam at the 2 spot you might free up some space to make a run at a contributor, with the starters and 2nd unit pretty much locked in we're probably looking for good locker room vets which, quite honestly, is probably the best thing for us right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • 45catfan
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By 45catfan · Posted

      I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...