Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So I modeled the season (and you aren't going to like it)


Happy Panther

Recommended Posts

I'm in a contest where you pick every game for the whole NFL season. Instead of trying to slog through 256 games I built a stochastic simulation model that chooses a victor for each and every game during the season. My assumptions are below but the results are as follows:

 

(Remember computers have no feelings)

 

mjlr8p.jpg

 

Highlights and lowlights from the Panthers: Some amazing familiarity here

 

1) We lose our opener 19-16 in overtime at Tampa

2) Lose to Detroit and Pittsburgh by 7 points total

3) Blowout Baltimore 43-18 to start 1-3

4) Lose by 1 to Chicago

5) Blown Out by Cincinnati with the first defensive hiccup giving up 35 points

6) Lose by 6 to Green Bay, 2 to Seattle and 3 to New Orleans. Now 1-8

7) Blowout Philly 35 -21

8) Lose to Atlanta 21-20... 2-9 on the season 

9) Much needed by week

10 And then a 5-0 to end the season missing the playoffs by 2 games. We average 32 points per game after the bye beating MINN, NO, TB, CLE, and ATL

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assumptions if anyone cares

 

1) I assumed that each team in each games scores independently of each other. While this obviously isn't true, trying to correlate scores in individual games is too complex and probably doesn't make a difference.

2) I assumed the average score is 24 and there will be roughly 1 team that scores under 12 and 1 that scores over 35 on average. I generated 10,000 scores (normal distibution) and each game randomly picks 2 scores from those 10,000

3) I assigned a relative strength to each team based on the previous season's results plus an assumption that good teams will get slightly worse and bad will get slightly better.

4) For each individual game the better team gets spotted a certain number of points based on strength. As an example Carolina gets 4 extra points in the opener (vegas line is -2.5) while Cincinnati gets 10 against Houston.

5) While i wanted the simulation to be random I also had to set some filters to make the choice itself random. So I demanded that 6 teams have a record at least 4 games different than the previous year and that both Seattle and Denver have winning records.

5) Once every game is simulated you just add up wins and losses.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it would make you feel better I can hit the button a few more times until it spits out 13 wins

 

And that proves that it is bunk.  If it changes that much with each time you run the program then it obviously has some major flaws. Unless it is consistently putting out fairly similar numbers, you have some very big flaws in your formulas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...