Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tangentially Panthers related - Interesting note on Offensive Lines


UNCrules2187

Recommended Posts

So the Cowboys SBNation blog had the opportunity to interview the author of FO's Almanac, Scott Kacsmar. While this is about the Cowboys (specifically why Kacsmar didn't like the Zach Martin pick), there's interesting nuggets here that pertain to the Panthers, specifically the question about our offensive line:

 

Personally, I'm not a big fan of using premium resources on interior linemen. I won't get into a huge essay about it, but I don't believe the variation in performance of guards or centers is great enough to use first-round picks. Leonard Davis was considered a bust at tackle for six years, but he went to Dallas, moved to right guard and was suddenly a Pro Bowl player. That's hard to buy.
 
If you want a run-heavy offense, then you need a better line, but that's not what Dallas is built for these days. I believe if you have a really good quarterback like Romo, then you don't need to focus on the interior line that much when there are more important positions to fix. Romo's sack rate has been fairly consistent with a tight range of 3.2 to 6.5 percent. The season it was the lowest (2010) was the year he broke his collarbone. Injuries can happen on any play. The play in which Romo came up very hobbled against Washington last year was actually a blown block by Tyron Smith, who is the best lineman on the team. I've thrown Smith under the bus twice now in this questionnaire, but it just goes to show how even your best assets can negatively impact your season with one play.
 
The Smith pick was great to get a franchise left tackle, but I think loading up with Travis Frederick and Zack Martin was overkill. It's nothing personal against those players, but I think the Cowboys had more pressing needs. We're not too excited about the safety position, but that could have been improved with a pick like Eric Reid (2013 draft) or Ha Ha Clinton-Dix. Romo just needed someone to snap him the ball properly (sorry, Phil Costa). Historically, the greatest centers in NFL history were not first-round picks, which is very unusual. The guy on pace to be the best first-round center ever is Nick Mangold. Maybe if the Jets had a good quarterback we'd see a better offense, but having Mangold and D'Brickashaw Ferguson did little to change their success. One of the few great lines to recently have a big impact was in Kansas City a decade ago (2002-05) with Willie Roaf, Brian Waters and Will Shields. However, like Dallas, that team didn't have a defense and never won a playoff game together.
 
Top three needs of a team should be a head coach, a quarterback and a defense. Building a great offensive line is a pipe dream in the salary cap era. Those who think they have the best assets usually don't have anything worth protecting, like Cleveland with Joe Thomas and Alex Mack. The 2008 Steelers and 2013 Seahawks won Super Bowls with pretty lousy lines and their quarterbacks under a lot of pressure. They still won because they had the No. 1 defense, and the quarterback delivered when he had to. Romo hasn't had a top 10 defense since 2009, which is not coincidentally the year he won his only playoff game. A quarterback's best friend is not his offensive line or running game, it's a great defense. It's hard to have one if you're taking guards and centers with first-round picks.
 

 

 

http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2014/8/7/5976479/five-questions-with-football-outsiders-about-the-dallas-cowboys-2014

 

The bottom paragraph seems to describe the Panthers to a T. 

 

So why is FO forever harping on our lack of offensive line talent? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes when i heard some media outlets and even fellow fans here on the Huddle suggesting right before the draft that we might take a guard with the first pick, the very thought of taking a guard made blood shoot from my eyes for these very reasons

Pics or it didn't happen

Sent from my XT1080 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Tackles arent exactly the position on the OL where you want to be weak, but I agree with the premise and agree overall that our strengths are more important than the perceived weaknesses. We've got a good team. Let's go out and shut people up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How? The kid played well last year. Will be a beast.

Warmack played well, but so did Larry Warford, who went at the top of 3 instead of the top of 1.  Warford was close to flawless. 

 

from the article: it talks about the '08 Steelers and '13 Seahawks won with bad lines, but that suggests the value of a QB that handles pressure very well.  Not all good QBs have that as their strongest point.  

 

 

 

Also reminds me of the ideal of the dominant LT being a thing of the past, that having a good line is better than having one good player.   Relatedly, Carolina pays exactly one OL high, and he's the guy who makes the calls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting point, but I am not completely sold.  BPA vs need, and value relative to the position should be taken into account regardless in my opinion.

 

Edit: Pie for the info and the use of the word "tangentially".  That's a new one for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting point, but I am not completely sold. BPA vs need, and value relative to the position should be taken into account regardless in my opinion.

Edit: Pie for the info and the use of the word "tangentially". That's a new one for me.

If you didn't skip out of trig or calculus you would know it

Sent from my XT1080 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I def believe this.

Wilson was the 3rd highest sacked QB last year.

Can't really remember a SB team that had a dominant OL.

Cowboys oline made that offense what it was

Sent from my iPhizzle while pooping using CarolinaHizzle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s overthrown WRs numerous times deep,I don’t think his arm strength there is a problem, def seems to be and issue in the 20-30 yard range, I don’t see a lot of outbreaking routes being completed, whether that’s due to his lack of ability to drive the ball to the outside hash or our WRs, especially XL cornering at the top of there routes. regardless of his weaknesses, the question is can a team be built around him to mask them, or can he overcome those weaknesses and adapt. I know it’s beating a dead horse, but something big is missing from Bryce’s qb play that’s leading to so many sub 200 yard passing games, all signs lead to a physical trait that’s the cause of this, wether it’s arm strength or his height  
    • That was fully intentional, because something people who engage in hyperbole can't stand is to be systematically told why and how they don't have a clue. It's the prevalence of this farcical idea that everyone's opinions are valid and the more impassioned they are about them, the more valid they are. And the point of the post wasn't merely to cut the knees of the exaggerators, but to illustrate why it shouldn't seem miraculous that someone like Mayfield and Darnold could come through Charlotte and fail and then suddenly seem much more successful elsewhere, when the reality is that there's far more to being successful at that position than one's own talent. It's also why young quarterbacks like Caleb Williams and Cam Ward deserve much longer leashes to determine their long-term viability and not be written off immediately, because the circumstances surrounding them are hardly conducive to success.
    • I think at some point you top out what God gave you.  He can use leverage via his mechanics to maximize what he has and When he pays attention to it the throws are better.    IMO as a layman a lot of it is what kind of ‘headroom’ you have. The guys who are gifted don’t have to use maximum effort to get good results and stay within themselves but they have it in reserve. They can do an arm throw for substantial distance without max effort.    I think what we may be seeing with these ‘lasers’ is a throw that Bryce puts the max effort into and does his mechanics right and has his base right and it works together.    To get to the payoff here, I think his best velocity throws take dall that whereas  a naturally gifted guy doesn’t need to go full effort to get that same velocity. I have said this three or four times over the years and it never gets picked up on but the accuracy is more consistent with an easier motion and max effort can produce less predictable location. It is a baseball pitcher thing but it applies to throwing a pass too. It isn’t that you can’t make an accurate throw with full effort it is just not as reliably accurate to the same degree. Someone said something about his pro day and that is where I saw it too. He took a little extra step on the deep throws. Some call it a hitch but I don’t see it that way because I don’t see it on shorter throws. He does it trying to get distance. I saw that and just wanted no part of it at 1.1 . That is not tne characteristic of a 1.1 passer.  He should have been at best, late first  I had him second day. Of course I am no one and certainly not a pro evaluator, it is just that he was so easy to suss out. It is kind of in your face obvious.  They must have thought they could fix him. Changing a lifelong throwing motion with the footwork tied into it is not fuging easy. Anyone that had decent success with ‘their’ way and tried to change it to get more, can tell you that.     
×
×
  • Create New...