Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pam Oliver questions to Cam?


heelinfine

Recommended Posts

I was pretty impressed with Lynch, the other guy and even Randy Moss.  Although he played for the Buccs, Lynch was a guy I enjoyed and respected and one of the few rivals I never 'hated'.  One thing that stood out to me, and maybe the first time I've watched a nationally televised game and didnt once recall hearing, in one way or another, 'the maturation of Cam Newton.'  I find that alone a small relief.  Otherwise, I felt they were very fair, prepared and knowledgable of the Panthers.  

 

For the Pam Oliver interview, I got back in time to see Bell get a mug shot in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeez. Some of the comments in here! Pam Oliver is recognized as being a consummate professional and one of the few, alongside Suzy Kolber who legitimize the sideline reporter position.

 

Like it or not, she asked good questions. She wasn't giving Luke crap. The fact is he has 3 sacks in 32 regular season games. Producing sacks in the regular season IS an area he can improve upon. And Cam will have to exercise patience with his stable of new receivers that he's had little time to work out with in live action. They aren't softball questions, they're completely valid.

 

You guys are pissed that she's not slobbing all over our players. Well that's not her job! No wonder you don't respect sideline reporters. You don't even want a sideline reporter you want a Panthers cheerleader in a pants suit!

 

God, you all are the reason that now sideline reporters are all going to be blonde bimbos from now on. But they'll look soooo HAWT while they're telling Luke how "hella cool it is that you were the DPOY last year. You're amazing! Panthers are number one, huh?! Can I get a selfie with you?"

 

 

...I hate you all.

 

Pretty much spot on about this thread in my opinion.

 

BTW, I am a 47 year old guy in pretty good shape, so Pam Oliver---with her 53-years-young self---looks pretty hot to me.  Just saying.  [she needs to kill that weave though...lol]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeez. Some of the comments in here! Pam Oliver is recognized as being a consummate professional and one of the few, alongside Suzy Kolber who legitimize the sideline reporter position.

Like it or not, she asked good questions. She wasn't giving Luke crap. The fact is he has 3 sacks in 32 regular season games. Producing sacks in the regular season IS an area he can improve upon. And Cam will have to exercise patience with his stable of new receivers that he's had little time to work out with in live action. They aren't softball questions, they're completely valid.

You guys are pissed that she's not slobbing all over our players. Well that's not her job! No wonder you don't respect sideline reporters. You don't even want a sideline reporter you want a Panthers cheerleader in a pants suit!

God, you all are the reason that now sideline reporters are all going to be blonde bimbos from now on. But they'll look soooo HAWT while they're telling Luke how "hella cool it is that you were the DPOY last year. You're amazing! Panthers are number one, huh?! Can I get a selfie with you?"

...I hate you all.

No pants suit, please. Just good 'ol fashioned lingerie.

Sent from my SCH-R970 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She only asks the question on the script. Pam could be a brainless, trained monkey. She only asks the questions FOX tells her to.

That's a racial slur, don't know if you intended it to be or not. It won't be addressed tho because of the double standard around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a racial slur, don't know if you attended it to be or not. It won't be addressed tho because of the double standard around here.

I'm sorry that you see racism in everything. You must not know about the training of animals to do simple tasks. Would it be better if he said bird, hippo, or dog?

Sent from my SCH-R970 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeez. Some of the comments in here! Pam Oliver is recognized as being a consummate professional and one of the few, alongside Suzy Kolber who legitimize the sideline reporter position.

Like it or not, she asked good questions. She wasn't giving Luke crap. The fact is he has 3 sacks in 32 regular season games. Producing sacks in the regular season IS an area he can improve upon. And Cam will have to exercise patience with his stable of new receivers that he's had little time to work out with in live action. They aren't softball questions, they're completely valid.

You guys are pissed that she's not slobbing all over our players. Well that's not her job! No wonder you don't respect sideline reporters. You don't even want a sideline reporter you want a Panthers cheerleader in a pants suit!

God, you all are the reason that now sideline reporters are all going to be blonde bimbos from now on. But they'll look soooo HAWT while they're telling Luke how "hella cool it is that you were the DPOY last year. You're amazing! Panthers are number one, huh?! Can I get a selfie with you?"

...I hate you all.

There is nothing wrong with a reporter asking questions, and I'm not upset that she wasn't "slobbering" over our players.

Her questions to Cam were loaded, and laced

with opinion. It was designed to get an off the

cuff, knee jerk reaction, but Cam was the real

"consummate professional."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry that you see racism in everything. You must not know about the training of animals to do simple tasks. Would it be better if he said bird, hippo, or dog?

Sent from my SCH-R970 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

I don't see racism in everything, I didn't put a hoodie on for trayvon, and I ain't marching for mike brown, but comparing a black person to a monkey is racist as hell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is nothing wrong with a reporter asking questions, and I'm not upset that she wasn't "slobbering" over our players.

Her questions to Cam were loaded, and laced

with opinion. It was designed to get an off the

cuff, knee jerk reaction, but Cam was the real

"consummate professional."

 

Sigh. [*sarcastically*] How was it a loaded question laced with opinion.

 

It was a well-formed question designed to get a real answer that a player can't just BS around or give a non-answer to. She could have just asked, "How is your rapport with the new receivers," to which Cam could just say, "good," or, "fine," or give some rehearsed, longer BS response that basically said "good" or "fine."

 

That's the mark of a good reporter. And that you can't distinguish between the two, again, is why we will have blonde airheads doing this job from now on. Because when a woman asks something incisive, she is labelled as clueless because her questions don't jive with the narrative that male fans want to hear.

 

Enjoy years of, "Hey, Cammy Cam! You're just the best! What is your favorite color?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After Bountygate and the information that came out on the Saints owners shielding pedophile priests in New Orleans it will forever be the Saints numero uno for me. FUG THE SAINTS! I hope this is just the beginning of a long term period of suffering for that shitty organization run by even shittier human beings. #2.Pats/Belicheat #3. Falcons (Mike Vick years then Matt Ryan/Julio running it up) Ryan pooping his pants and 28-3 def makes my bad days always better just thinking of those. #4 Pretty much any franchise fan base thats obnoxious Steelers, Eagles, Bills, Jets, Giants, Cowboys, etc.
    • Thank God DM used that #8 pick on a bona fide WR1 and not some bum pass rushing prospect like Stewart or someone else. I believe Tet is legit WR1 material and going forward will be our long term answer at that position since we desperately were in need of one once they traded away DJ Moore.  Tet could possibly end up even being better long term than someone who I respect a ton as a WR in Moore. Evans has been a pleasant surprise and great TE/FB depth piece going forward who could make the most of his opportunities.  Any good offense worth a damn in the NFL has 3 TEs that can do multiple things and being scared by Ian Thomas play for years should makes us all appreciate what Evans is quietly doing as a ROOKIE at one of the hardest positions to learn at the pro level.  Keep cooking DM. This season is not over obviously but seeing some growth out of young talent finally is a breathe of fresh fuggin air for once. 
    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
×
×
  • Create New...