Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Cuts 8-24

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted

I just don't think Avant, Cotchery, or Dickson are very good.

I actually have hope for Dickson. Should get his chance with Benji and Olsen commanding most of the D's attention.

I'm with you on Cotchery an Avant. Cotchery is a number 3 at best being asked to be a number 2. They are asking too much out of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4Corners Grand Master

4Corners

Posted
Posted

I actually have hope for Dickson. Should get his chance with Benji and Olsen commanding most of the D's attention.

I'm with you on Cotchery an Avant. Cotchery is a number 3 at best being asked to be a number 2. They are asking too much out of him.

 

Dickson at least has shown something here and there. He doesn't really have the pressure on him that Cotchery and Avant have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4Corners Grand Master

4Corners

Posted
Posted

Right, but they don't have to catch a ton to be effective. We're talking about 3rd and 4th receivers.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

 

the entire team is made up of "3rd and 4th" WRs. Olsen is going to get a lot of targets but he looks like one of the slowest TEs in the NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted

Dickson at least has shown something here and there. He doesn't really have the pressure on him that Cotchery and Avant have.

It's no secret we still need a number 2 WR. I really wish DG would've addressed this is one of the deepest WR drafts of all time.

Cotchery and Avant are being set up to disappoint. Both these guys are situational type WR's. Cotchery is a nice slot option in the redzone and Avant is a nice 3rd down option. Instead they are asking Cotchery to line up on the other side of Benji and Avant to be the slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4Corners Grand Master

4Corners

Posted
Posted

It's no secret we still need a number 2 WR. I really wish DG would've addressed this is one of the deepest WR drafts of all time.

Cotchery and Avant are being set up to disappoint. Both these guys are situational type WR's. Cotchery is a nice slot option in the redzone and Avant is a nice 3rd down option. Instead they are asking Cotchery to line up on the other side of Benji and Avant to be the slot.

 

Yup. Loved the value we got from Ealy and Turner fit a need...but I still think they could have got aggressive got another one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Razeyfingers Newbie

Razeyfingers

Posted
Posted

Dickson at least has shown something here and there. He doesn't really have the pressure on him that Cotchery and Avant have. 

 

Im not sure what case youre trying to make here so I think Id like to ask you for some clarity. Do you think Avant and Cotchery are bad/subpar receivers? Do you think that because you are watching them on the field with your eyeballs? or is there some other reason you think you have proof?

 

What is the most defining flaw that proves your point? Can you show me in what way they are is bad? Is it separation, bad hands, lost when they run routes? I would like to hear you explain it in greater detail.

 

 

Im really not trying to poke at you, Im genuinely curious what you have to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • 45catfan
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By 45catfan · Posted

      I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...