Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

One small thing that helps Hardy's chances of playing Sunday....


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Honestly I think the best thing for the Panthers moving forward is to cut him. It's highly unlikely that they'd sign him next year if found not guilty in court(which is probably going to move to the off season). If they suspend him for 4 games, they look foolish to the rest of the NFL community/fan base because they let him play week 1, then benched him, then decided on a punishment. It makes them look like they either don't care about a crime being committed or that they support him regardless of the "guilty" verdict in July. If we don't do anything and let it play out, we run the risk of losing sponsors.

So we cut him.... Best solution as a franchise. I'd highly miss him as he was my favorite defender and I would rather we had waited until November before doing anything but it's too late now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I think the best thing for the Panthers moving forward is to cut him. It's highly unlikely that they'd sign him next year if found not guilty in court(which is probably going to move to the off season). If they suspend him for 4 games, they look foolish to the rest of the NFL community/fan base because they let him play week 1, then benched him, then decided on a punishment. It makes them look like they either don't care about a crime being committed or that they support him regardless of the "guilty" verdict in July. If we don't do anything and let it play out, we run the risk of losing sponsors.

So we cut him.... Best solution as a franchise. I'd highly miss him as he was my favorite defender and I would rather we had waited until November before doing anything but it's too late now.

 

$13M down the drain. solid business move

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the way Addison played last week, and Greg potentially being distracted by other things, we might be better off if Addison starts.

 

Hardy is far better against the run than Addison. The Lions played to Addison's strength by passing the ball early and often. I'm not as confident he can have similar success setting the edge and playing the rush against big backs like Bell and Blount. We are a better team with Hardy on the field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...