Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

6 years, $150,250,000, $54,000,000 guaranteed, Projected contract for Cam


jasonluckydog

Recommended Posts

Flacco got a six-year, $120.6 million contract with $52 million guaranteed

So $20 million/year for Flacco. Is Cam worth an extra $5 million/year over Flacco?

Doesn't seem that far-fetched

Problem with this math is Flacco is not worth his contract.They overpaid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if you try the fallacy of equating QB and wins.

Cam takes over a 2-14 team with a historically bad offense and in year 3 gets them to 12-4 with a playoff bye and people dont want to pay him because he didn't get enough wins or didn't get to NFC Championship game his first opportunity.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!

Some of you guys a stretching the limits of believability with this stuff.

You should really think things through before hitting that post button.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if you try the fallacy of equating QB and wins.

Cam takes over a 2-14 team with a historically bad offense and in year 3 gets them to 12-4 with a playoff bye and people dont want to pay him because he didn't get enough wins or didn't get to NFC Championship game his first opportunity.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!

Some of you guys a stretching the limits of believability with this stuff.

You should really think things through before hitting that post button.

 

But who was top 2 defense?

 

You might need to take your own advice, or at the very least consider other factors. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But who was top 2 defense?

You might need to take your own advice, or at the very least consider other factors.

Maybe you can create a slide and scale based on a QB to defense ratio so I know when I should attribute wins to the QB and when to attribute them to the defense. That way we don't have to jump back and forth to prove false narratives.

Like, for instance, Tom Brady never won a Super Bowl without a top 6 scoring defense. Therefore, based on slide and scale he has zero Super Bowls but Pats defense has three and Brady should not be paid like a Super Bowl winning QB.

Does that work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I swear some of our fans treat Cam the same way that the national media does.

In 2011/12 when we lost a bunch of close games that we shoulda won and the media pretty much blamed Cam and only Cam. They refused to acknowledge that Cam and the offense had done all they could to get a 4th quarter lead but the D couldn't hold on to it bc of the weak spots on defense. Even 2012's 10th overall in total D was misleading bc their 4th qtr points/yards were near the bottom of the league but never mentioned after close losses.

Now that the FO has built up the defense to help the offense instead of vice versa all of a sudden Cam's value to this squad has dropped in some ppl's opinion bc they think the D is doing everything and Cam just has to be Trent Dilfer and NOT fug up the game. Go defense.....ooops i meant go Panthers.

 

Hell, even 2013 the defense blew some late 4th Qtr lead to bum QB's (EJ Manuel, who was a bum at the time, and Josh Freeman), early in the season for some horrendous last minute losses.

 

But yes! Everything you said was true, about the team, fans and the media!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, other teams over pay players and we should simply because they do? 

 

Cam is gonna get paid a lot of money, regardless of the opinion of ppl on the huddle. 

 

Just some of us are a bit gun shy and concerned about paying a poo ton of money for someone that has not been able (thus far) to put things together and will us to playoff victories.

 

 

I do not have game pass yet so I can not go back and watch every snap of our playoff loss to the niners. 

 

If I were a betting man I would put my money on Cam missing reads, holding on to the ball too long, and making some poor passes. 

 

You have to focus on playoffs to a certain degree because that is when the most pressure is on. Some QBs wilt under pressure and some rise to the occasion. 

 

Yea, I wouldnt have wanted to give Manning a MASSIVE contract until he won a few playoffs games as well. That goes for any QB. 

 

I want to see how they perform in the biggest stages at the highest level. 

 

Not sure when and why the NFL got to paying ELITE money to non elite players. 

 

Cam is on his way, def, but he aint there yet.

I understand that you are leery of having to pay Cam poo tons of money. Especially since, at this point, he hasn't won in the playoffs. But...the market sets the value. Not wins, no matter where or how they come, or don't come.

The market value for franchise QBs is through the roof. Nothing we/you/anyone can do about it. It would be great if someone would take the bull by the horns and say, "No more". But that ain't gonna happen.

We will pay Cam what the market says we will pay him. And it is going to be a lot of money.

The one saving grace is that the salary cap is going up. So it shouldn't handicap us by the time Cam gets his, as much as it has some teams who have paid out recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe you can create a slide and scale based on a QB to defense ratio so I know when I should attribute wins to the QB and when to attribute them to the defense. That way we don't have to jump back and forth to prove false narratives.

Like, for instance, Tom Brady never won a Super Bowl without a top 6 scoring defense. Therefore, based on slide and scale he has zero Super Bowls but Pats defense has three and Brady should not be paid like a Super Bowl winning QB.

Does that work?

 

We simply have to use our head on this as there is no set metric to gauge such. 

 

For instance, 

 

The Panthers are known for having an awesome defense. It is our signature. Cam doesn't go out there (generally) and amase 400 yards of total offense week in and week out. Past couple of years he has been more of a game manager. Lowish passing yards with a decent amount of rushing yards. Basically, OC wants Cam to manage the game. Don't make stupid plays, burn clock, lean on the D and running game. Which, Cam has been doing pretty well. 

 

Tom Brady is known for slinging the rock all around the field (300+ passing yards a game). 

 

Maybe PFF accounts for overall impact on a game, I do not know. All I know is our D is what lead us to 12-4 last year. Cam did a great job of complimenting the D. Run the the TOP offense, cut back on turnovers, etc. 

 

Manning, Rodgers, Brees etc are people that lead their teams. For SEA and CAR it's the D first. Cam and Wilson play more of a Robin role than Batman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...