Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How long is the Huddle gonna defend Shula?


MedellinHeel

Recommended Posts

We seriously struggle to score more than 21 points a game. Half the time against good D's we struggle to even score more than 14. 

 

Which is really alarming due to having one of the best D's in the game. Our O gets more opportunities due to stout defense and take always. 

 

If Shula doesn't turn this around by the end of the season he needs to be replaced with a proven play caller. 

 

in b4 the "TOP comments". 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His offense works in mistake free football where we can hold opponents under ~13-17 points.  

 

When you can't run block on top of it, you're going to have issues against a lot of defenses.  Especially 3-4s imo.  WR routes are designed very poorly in my opinion.  

 

I've been rooting like crazy for two guys in particular but Horton and Brown f'd up.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm honestly looking beyond DC at this point. He's too green and is making too many simple mistakes. I think he's gone after next year. I think the intention in LV was to use Mayer and Bowers similar to Gronk/Hernandez in NE. That's never really struck me as Carroll's MO though after watching him for years out here in Seattle.  He's talented enough and I think he just got lost behind the phenom that is Bowers because he couldn't develop in Carroll's system. I'm surprised Bowers is used as much as he is, though they really don't have anyone else. TE's don't really exist as focus receivers in Carroll's offense. I live in the PNW so I've been subjected to a lot of Seahawks football.  Coaches other utilize their TEs. We should too. Tremble is OK, but he's always been a project as a receiver. Again, all this is of we could get him at the right price. I wouldn't pay a lot because we need to spend on defense. 
    • David. Hey, money talks.....it has been acknowledged that Tepper isn't shy on spending. He's had the NFL equivalents of used car salesman after used car salesman line up to grift him of a big chunk. Canales is one of them.  Until that changes, it's gonna be tough to build anything to last.
    • Well it's who they tied themselves to for at least another year but i agree. They will be lucky to find a useful contributor but until I see the DC situation change I am presuming it's SSDD. Well it sounds like maybe in 2027. 
×
×
  • Create New...