Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

O-Line\No Huddle


CubsWin

Recommended Posts

I've read it somewhere this morning and it's what I thought last night.. Cam's interception (his only of the year and we're in week 5) was a tip.. There were several tips during the Bears game.. My thought is that is a direct result of good blocking.  I was pleased with the way our O-Line played yesterday.  The first half was a brain fart for the entire team, I really liked what I saw in the second half from an 0-Line that has received some negativity from the huddle recently.

 

Secondly, I have a question.  When this team does no huddle we absolutely dominate, they essentially give the keys to Cam and let him fly.  Why is this something that is not utilized more?  Is there a downside to running this more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't went back and looked, but tipped balls are usually a mixture of 3 things:

 

1. QB throwing the ball too low.  Sometimes height has a role in it.  Side-arming it.  If I recall, a lot of passes from Clausen would get batted down for this reason.  Wasn't a tall guy (for a QB) and didn't throw a good ball.

 

2. Offensive line not getting the DL's hands down.  If you are loose with the defensive lineman and they can freely jump, then it is hard for the QB to find passing lanes.  

 

3. Excellent anticipation by the DL.  JJ Watt is splendid at this.  When you are under center in an offense that preaches getting the ball out fast, DL expect you to throw on that 3rd, 4th drop.  If they can get their hands up in time, it leads to batted passes because usually you aren't throwing a "high" pass if that makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Must establish the run & control the clock. It's a process.

 

The no-huddle and success through the air yesterday opened up the run game for us. You don't have to establish the run first. Controlling the clock is important when your defense is elite and you have a run game that can actually sustain a drive. We may have an elite defense but it's a little questionable in some areas, but we absolutely do not have a run game that can sustain a drive on its own. Need the passing game to open it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The no huddle works if you can consistently move the ball and your defense can stay out on the field for long periods of time.  One of the problems with teams that run the no huddle is that you might have our defense come in after giving up a 15 play drive only to get less than 2 minutes rest and back on the field. 

 

Sure it is great with less than 2 minutes on the clock which then works because teams are more in prevent defense and you have to throw so you aren't fooling anyone by not putting out 4 receivers in coverage.  But doing that all the time can backfire.  I think Denver and Philly are the only teams that run the hurry up most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The no huddle works if you can consistently move the ball and your defense can stay out on the field for long periods of time.  One of the problems with teams that run the no huddle is that you might have our defense come in after giving up a 15 play drive only to get less than 2 minutes rest and back on the field. 

 

Sure it is great with less than 2 minutes on the clock which then works because teams are more in prevent defense and you have to throw so you aren't fooling anyone by not putting out 4 receivers in coverage.  But doing that all the time can backfire.  I think Denver and Philly are the only teams that run the hurry up most of the time.

You are correct they do, the Patriots do it quite a bit as well..  My only point is this.. I've never watched this team run the no huddle and NOT be successful.  When I say "this team" I mean in the Cam era.. Am I mistaken?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we will see more no huddle in the coming weeks. For some reason it helps the oline. Probably because it tires the opposing line.

we need that 75% of the time. can you imagine the increase benefit of the run game considering lbs/dbs would back up...Ron better say something because it likely never even happened in shula's mind already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The no huddle works if you can consistently move the ball and your defense can stay out on the field for long periods of time.  One of the problems with teams that run the no huddle is that you might have our defense come in after giving up a 15 play drive only to get less than 2 minutes rest and back on the field. 

 

Sure it is great with less than 2 minutes on the clock which then works because teams are more in prevent defense and you have to throw so you aren't fooling anyone by not putting out 4 receivers in coverage.  But doing that all the time can backfire.  I think Denver and Philly are the only teams that run the hurry up most of the time.

 

Correct...and we all know the success Denver and Philly has had using it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we need that 75% of the time. can you imagine the increase benefit of the run game considering lbs/dbs would back up...Ron better say something because it likely never even happened in shula's mind already.

I think 75% is a bit too high. We need to pick our spots wisely

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The no huddle works if you can consistently move the ball and your defense can stay out on the field for long periods of time.  One of the problems with teams that run the no huddle is that you might have our defense come in after giving up a 15 play drive only to get less than 2 minutes rest and back on the field. 

 

Sure it is great with less than 2 minutes on the clock which then works because teams are more in prevent defense and you have to throw so you aren't fooling anyone by not putting out 4 receivers in coverage.  But doing that all the time can backfire.  I think Denver and Philly are the only teams that run the hurry up most of the time.

 

I would agree with that, but we don't have the offensive personnel to sustain anything right now.  A 6-7 play drive throwing the ball is better than a 3 and out when running the ball.  Personally, I think you do some of both, hurry to the line, get the defense on their heels using the pass, spread the ball then run the ball to slow it down some.  I think with them signing Ogbannaya, it has shown that we are planning on using a more pass heavy game because it is what our personnel dictates.  Use a short pass game to open up the run game, the key component missing is a speadster which I really think Philly could become.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here’s a summary of the JJ and Luke podcast transcript. Opening / Bryce Young Fifth-Year Option     •    JJ: Breaking news — Panthers picked up Bryce Young’s fifth-year option at $25.9M, guaranteed, coming in 2027. Combined with his 2025 salary of ~$6M, that’s $31M over two years — called it a “no-brainer.”     •    Luke: Enthusiastic about the move. Highlighted Bryce’s improving TD/INT ratios (11/10 → 15/9 → 23/11) and the value of entering year three with Dave Canales. Noted $25M is a bargain relative to the $60M top of market. Luke’s Personal Update — Charlotte Christian Football     •    Luke: Working with Charlotte Christian school football program, which hired a new head coach. Coaches include Greg Olsen, Luke, and Greg’s dad Chris Olsen (a New Jersey State coaching Hall of Famer).     •    JJ: Jokingly quipped that Charlotte Christian’s coaching staff is “the world’s greatest” — a Fox analyst, a Hall of Famer, and the best Panthers RB ever — all coaching middle school football.     •    Luke: Praised Chris Olsen’s deep football knowledge spanning decades and his ability to connect with kids. Round 1, Pick 19 — Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia     •    JJ: Panthers were on the clock and submitted their pick almost immediately — a sign of confidence and preparation. Freeling is 6’7”, 320 lbs, played in the SEC in a pro-style system.     •    Luke: Loved the pick. Emphasized you can never have too many quality offensive linemen. Noted Freeling’s size, athleticism, and arm length as key traits. Said the pick also reflects team’s philosophy of drafting great people, not just great players.     •    JJ: Noted reporter Darren Gantt compared Freeling favorably to Jordan Gross — bigger, heavier, and faster — as a potential franchise left tackle.     •    Luke: Pointed out that young players like Freeling still have physical development ahead of them, comparing the trajectory to Christian McCaffrey’s growth from age 20 onward. Round 2, Pick 49 — Lee Hunter, DT, Texas Tech     •    JJ: Panthers traded up from 51 to 49 (pick swap with Minnesota) to grab Hunter. Played audio from Panthers area scout Kaden McLuhan, who scouted Hunter.     •    Scout Kaden McLuhan (audio): Said Hunter’s size is immediately striking, and that everyone around him spoke glowingly about his character, energy, and love for the game.     •    Luke: Praised Hunter as a massive (6’3”, 320 lbs, ~34” arms) two-gap nose tackle who fits perfectly in the Evero defense. Compared his prospect profile to Akiem Hicks. Said having Derek Brown, Bobby Brown, Derrick Brown, Terson Wharton, and now Hunter creates varied body types that stress offensive linemen.     •    JJ: Noted Hunter ranked third among all prospects in run-stuff rate and sixth in interior pass-rush win rate — addressing a perception that he couldn’t rush the passer. Rounds 3–7 Highlights     •    Luke: Highlighted WR Brazle (3rd round, 6’4”, 437 speed, 1,000+ yards at Tennessee) as the vertical threat the offense needed. Also praised OL Sam Heck (5th round) as a technically sound player whose “short arms” caused him to fall but who has proven himself.     •    Luke: Mentioned CB Will Lee (6’1”, 33” arms) fits the Panthers’ DB prototype — big, long corners.     •    Luke: Praised S/LB hybrid Zaki Wheatley (5th round, 6’3”) as a big nickel similar to Trayvon Merek.     •    Luke: Excited about the linebacker competition between Devin Lloyd, Trevvin Wallace, and Claudin Cherless.     •    JJ: Noted Panthers had the #1 “steal/overreach” rating in the entire draft — drafting players lower than consensus big boards projected. Around the League     •    Luke: Admitted being “a little jealous” that the Miami Dolphins drafted LB Jacob Rodriguez (Luke’s favorite LB in the draft). Has personal connections to Miami’s coaching staff (Jeff Hafley, DC Shawn Dugen — a childhood teammate).     •    Luke: Also noted Miami’s selection of OT/G Kaden Proctor out of Alabama, who will likely move to guard. League Trends — Bigger Tight Ends / 12 & 13 Personnel     •    JJ: Observed the NFL saw its highest run rate in ~11 years (~52%) and a notable pivot toward big blocking tight ends in this draft.     •    Luke: Explained the cyclical nature of NFL offense/defense evolution — as defenses get smaller to match spread offenses, teams counter with bigger personnel (12/13 formations), which then forces defenses to get bigger at the nickel/“big nickel” spot. Called it an ongoing arms race.
    • Dan Vladar is their best player and that is going to be the difference in the series 
×
×
  • Create New...