Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Staying together for the sake of the kids?


Happy Panther

Recommended Posts

What is your view on hanging on to relationships when kids are involved?

 

I know a couple who don't have intimacy but more of a business/roommate arrangement to keep their kids happy. I think that was standard back in the day but couples are much more likely to divorce these days and let the kids deal with it.

 

I'm excluding abusive relationships and the like.

 

Not about me FYI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are they attempting to work on their relationship or are they just being lazy and saying ohh there is no longer a spark. If they have legitimately made an effort to rekindle things it may be time to move on, if not they need to grow up and realize relationships take work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kids aren't stupid. They can read the body language of parents and can tell when things aren't right. Also, they will find a ton of ways to blame their parents problems on themselves. If financially possible, the best move IMO is to split, explain that sometimes relationships change between people, but as parents they will always love their kids and nothing will ever change that. If not financially possible, then the parents having individual rooms while co-parenting may be an option, but not really sure how that would work out. 

 

My parents stayed together even though it was obvious the spark had died a long time ago. I saw it when I was about 13 or so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My opinion on this is next to nothing because I'm not a parent. But I feel when you have a child in the situation given you owe it to that child to give them a normal life growing up. And if it means spending a couple decades with someone you're not crazy about that's what you have to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My opinion on this is next to nothing because I'm not a parent. But I feel when you have a child in the situation given you owe it to that child to give them a normal life growing up. And if it means spending a couple decades with someone you're not crazy about that's what you have to do.

This. Except maybe not a few decades but if your kids are closer to an age where they are going to be leaving at 18 assuming college, work, etc...I think its worth it to stay together if you can be amicable for your kids.

My parents have been together my whole life and my bfs were divorced 12 years ago and it was not amicable.

Its amazing the differences we have between our families & how we interact, and its very obvious that majority of it spurs from that one event in their lives.

That was something that couldn't be avoided but the impact is certainly there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife has two children from a previous marriage that was beyond salvageable.  She tried to "stay in it for the kids" for years, but it does more harm than good in the long run, which most people aren't able to see since it's such an emotionally invested scenario.  The kids grow up thinking this sort of contentious marriage/relationship is normal, and since she has two girls, that even worse...a husband/father being domineering and abusive is OK.  Instead, she and I promised to ourselves that we would offer a loving, supportive, and nurturing environment for the kids so THAT is what they see as the model relationship instead of a dysfunctional one.  I know not all people who get out of bad marriages with kids end up in better scenarios, the odds are the opposite...but in our case, it was the best for all involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife has two children from a previous marriage that was beyond salvageable.  She tried to "stay in it for the kids" for years, but it does more harm than good in the long run, which most people aren't able to see since it's such an emotionally invested scenario.  The kids grow up thinking this sort of contentious marriage/relationship is normal, and since she has two girls, that even worse...a husband/father being domineering and abusive is OK.  Instead, she and I promised to ourselves that we would offer a loving, supportive, and nurturing environment for the kids so THAT is what they see as the model relationship instead of a dysfunctional one.  I know not all people who get out of bad marriages with kids end up in better scenarios, the odds are the opposite...but in our case, it was the best for all involved.

 

The scenario was a non-abusive relationship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Im not firm on many things football, but this statement or belief or strategy I am 100% for. Full Offseason the goal is to make the playoffs. Week 1, 1000% I want to win. Weeks 2-10,  1000% I want to win. Until the math stats 0.000000000% chance at NO playoffs, I want to win. *Once* there's no chance at the playoffs, I want to 100% lose every game until the end. You are still loser at 2-15 or 5-12, I want to never lose like this again. I want the best value for losing and suffering. Again the only goal is playoffs. Once in the playoffs anything can happen, I want to win the whole dam show. If you happen to lose in the first round, that's perfectly fine and lets work hard this upcoming off-season to get another chance to make them.  This is the ONLY way to play in the NFL. Anyone not understanding this method of strategy, please call your doctor for a visit...
    • Purdy's good but at the end of the day you're paying first class money for a business class seat.  It's a big problem with the salary cap.  QBs take most of it whether they are Pat Mahomes or not.
    • Purdy saved the 49ers from that three 1st picks for Trey Lance. People forget that. People also forget he should have MVP votes for the 23 season. He's been any where from the 8th(his best/23) to 14th ranked QB, he's legit and guys around top 10 get paid as QBs.....guys in 28th get paid too, he's 4x the QB Trevor Lawrence is and better than BY by miles as well...even without CMC, Samuel(whos a RB playing WE), and half the OL.    *BUT*    You non-believers missed this ultra important mistake that honestly made me reconsider all the praise I gave him. https://www.si.com/nfl/49ers/news/49ers-qb-brock-purdy-throws-blind-40-percent   That's is damming to my case and reset my thinking of his. That's nuclear scary now and I need some time.  too honest for me to overlook. 
×
×
  • Create New...