Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

the official "Dave Gettleman fuging sucks" thread


Ace_Aladdin

Recommended Posts

We had bad weeks after Pitt and Baltimore blowouts as well. At what point will the jock sniffers stop blaming the fans for the negativity when the on field product is so bad?

 

Exactly. These dicklickers get more bent out of shape because of a mean thing someone is saying on a Panthers message board than they are the stupidity and pathetic play we've seen out of this team week after week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Negativity is one thing, stupidity is another.

Who's more stupid? The GM who has two seasons to address needs on the OLine and secondary in the draft or free agency, but doesn't, cuts the entire team that got them to the playoffs instead of building on it, and gives the franchise QB weak, slow targets. Or the fans who call him out on it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who's more stupid? The GM who has two seasons to address needs on the OLine and secondary in the draft or free agency, but doesn't, cuts the entire team that got them to the playoffs instead of building on it, and gives the franchise QB weak, slow targets. Or the fans who call him out on it?

The fans who think they could have done a better job are pretty much always morons.

Likewise the ones for whom the most intelligent comment they can muster is "Everybody sucks! Fire them all and start over again every year until we win a championship!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...