Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We SHOULD win the NFC South


htown704

Recommended Posts

Based on how our division is playing, and looking at the upcoming schedule for the Falcons and the Saints, we should win the division.  Remember, records are reset to 0-0 in the playoffs.  Look at the 7-9 Seahawk team that won their playoff game.  Have we looked great this season?  No, but we still have a shot to stay in the mix and get better as we go.

 

Here is a look at the rest of the Panthers, Falcons, and Saints games (Bucs are clearly still rebuilding so not including them).  Every team highlighted in Bold are currently .500 and below:

 

Panthers          Falcons          Saints

 

Seahawks       Lions (UK)      Packers

Saints             BYE                @Panthers

@Eagles         @Bucs           49ers

Falcons         @Panthers      Bengals

BYE                 Browns          Ravens

@Vikings        Cardinals        @Steelers

@Saints         @Packers        Panthers

Bucs               Steelers          @Bears

Browns           @Saints         Falcons

@Falcons       Panthers         @Bucs

 

 

The fact that we have a 1.5 game lead in the division, and the fact that our schedule doesn't look nearly as bad for the second half of the year, we should be able to maintain a lead.  I still think we can go 9-6-1 or 8-7-1 and take the division for a Home Playoff Game.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we're gonna get smoked by some wildcard team in the playoffs though

Cowboys, Lions, Packers, Cardinals and 49ers will be the non-NFCS playoff teams. If we win the division I would be worried going against 3 of those teams, Cowboys, Lions and Packers. Cards and 49ers we can beat because their QBs suck. Maybe Lions too but we aren't the same team that handled the Lions week 2. I see us going 10-5-1 losing to the Saints in NO and either Seattle or Philly. Philly is not as good a team as their record suggests and I think we could win that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on how our division is playing, and looking at the upcoming schedule for the Falcons and the Saints, we should win the division. Remember, records are reset to 0-0 in the playoffs. Look at the 7-9 Seahawk team that won their playoff game. Have we looked great this season? No, but we still have a shot to stay in the mix and get better as we go.

Here is a look at the rest of the Panthers, Falcons, and Saints games (Bucs are clearly still rebuilding so not including them). Every team highlighted in Bold are currently .500 and below:

Panthers Falcons Saints

Seahawks Lions (UK) Packers

@Saints BYE Panthers

@Eagles @Bucs 49ers

Falcons @Panthers Bengals

BYE Browns Ravens

@Vikings Cardinals Steelers

Saints @Packers @Panthers

Bucs Steelers @Bears

Browns @Saints Falcons

@Falcons Panthers @Bucs

The fact that we have a 1.5 game lead in the division, and the fact that our schedule doesn't look nearly as bad for the second half of the year, we should be able to maintain a lead. I still think we can go 9-6-1 or 8-7-1 and take the division for a Home Playoff Game.

How the hell do the aints get 6 straight home games?? Wth???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...