Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers believe Hardy innocent, will try to workout extension

nctarheel0619

By nctarheel0619,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TimTom Newbie

TimTom

Posted
Posted

fuggin yes, hopefully Greg isn't too jaded from this crap

 

edit - if/when he is found innocent and we sign him long term, does anyone think we should get some kind of considerations from the NFL?  I would suggest cap relief or extra draft picks (compensatory type) if that's a possibility with the CBA.  It seems, however, this is all being made up on the fly, so perhaps Goodell can act unilaterally and do the Panthers a solid before he's run out of town when Ray Rice wins his appeal, suits back up, and this ishstorm starts again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Rising Star

Montsta

Posted
Posted

I'm going to go into the Tinderbox to run this theory by venom and see what he thinks;

But what if the Panthers paid Nicole Holder for this whole fiasco to drop Greg's asking price down on a long term deal, knowing they'd never be able to afford him without such a bizarre occurrence happening?

#gettlevoodoo

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Matthias Proficient

Matthias

Posted
Posted

So we are having this dance again.  Had we let Hardy walk like we should have, we could have signed a LT, re-signed Mitchell to play with DeCoud, maybe signed a receiver worth his salt, and who knows else.  Now we want to throw some more cash towards Hardy, and have Bell at LT for another 10 years.  Sounds like a well thought out plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      It's not even a particularly nuanced opinion, yet it seems out of reach for so many.
    • strato
      Bryce's Achilles Heel Is Not What You Think It Is

      By strato · Posted

      I don’t think he can be great. For me he tops out as starter maybe make the playoffs, stuff like that. I would have been okay with that kind of player as a placeholder but you don’t invest the time and assets we did and be happy with that.  On the cure,If a guy has mechanical flaws but otherwise is enticing, you let someone else make the mistake of taking him in the top of the 1st. If he doesn’t get taken you can pick him up 2nd or 3rd day and try to develop him (off the bench not starting).  The risk/reward with Bryce was horribly misjudged. I didn’t want to trade like that in the first place because I didn’t see the generation talent that justifies that type of move, but once it was done CJ was the better gamble. No doubt. 
    • kungfoodude
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      That's what I mean. If you claim to possess some super knowledge about the QB position from a previous non-football but football related job, wouldn't you want to expound upon that to support this "everyone doesn't know anything about being a QB" thesis? The rest is just summed up by stating that there are a lot of variables to a QB being successful. Yeah....I mean that isn't earth shattering.  While there is certainly a lot of luck involved in all manners of success, consistent success with the variables around you also changing on a regular basis is usually fairly conclusive.  Is Trent Dilfer the same as Tom Brady? Is Nick Foles the same as Patrick Mahomes? I supposed based on the OP's arguments, they are. That's not really the way it turned out, however.  The NFL isn't unlike most other jobs or even other sports. The cream typically does rise to the top on a more consistent basis. Is it accidental that premier poker players seem to win or perform very well on a consistent basis, give that any individual hand is largely luck?  
×
×
  • Create New...