Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Here's what the garbage time stats tell me.

toldozer

By toldozer,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

toldozer Grand Master

toldozer

Posted
Posted

Cam, KB and Greg Olsen can play football. The rest of this offense is offensive. Once the dogs were called off and cam wasn't under constant pressure those three made plays. Once we get rid of shula and completely revamp this doo doo "offensive" line we might just have a decent team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UpstatePanther Newbie

UpstatePanther

Posted
Posted

Cam, KB and Greg Olsen can play football. The rest of this offense is offensive. Once the dogs were called off and cam wasn't under constant pressure those three made plays. Once we get rid of shula and completely revamp this doo doo "offensive" line we might just have a decent team.

 

you make the assumption that Cam and Olsen still want to play for this team... right now it doesnt look like Cam wants to. and Olsen has been obviously frustrated lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherFan4Ever Newbie

PantherFan4Ever

Posted
Posted

Cam, KB and Greg Olsen can play football. The rest of this offense is offensive. Once the dogs were called off and cam wasn't under constant pressure those three made plays. Once we get rid of shula and completely revamp this doo doo "offensive" line we might just have a decent team.

 

Football games are won/lost at the line of scrimmage.  So yes...improving the O-line will solve a lot of problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CelibatePimp Newbie

CelibatePimp

Posted
Posted

Cam, KB and Greg Olsen can play football. The rest of this offense is offensive. Once the dogs were called off and cam wasn't under constant pressure those three made plays. Once we get rid of shula and completely revamp this doo doo "offensive" line we might just have a decent team.

 

Garbage time stats are called that for a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jeremy Igo Newbie

Jeremy Igo

Posted
Posted

Olsen was the only stud I saw on the field, Cam had moments but also threw into coverage, locked onto receivers and showed poor mobility.

 

Why does it take us getting down by 2+ touchdowns to start targeting our TE?

 

They expect us to target our TE! Go long Cotch!

 

 

lol

 

 

at some point, you just have to laugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPcavedweller Grand Master

CPcavedweller

Posted
Posted

Olsen was the only stud I saw on the field, Cam had moments but also threw into coverage, locked onto receivers and showed poor mobility.

Why does it take us getting down by 2+ touchdowns to start targeting our TE?

The reason no receivers are open is because we only send 3 against 8 defenders. Teams can get to Cam with 4 guys Olsen and the running backs stay back to block because our offensive line is poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted

Joe Webb may be our second best receiver, and its not close.

But the Huddle told me all offseason that we were fine at WR! There were some that even said this before we drafted KB

I agree with Webb though. His catch last night was the best by any WR not named KB this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRed Newbie

TheRed

Posted
Posted

We were just discussing this... long bombs to Cotchery.

 

Is that Cam's call or is that the design of the play?  I mean, the DB had him easily beat every single time.

 

I kind of doubt that Newton wants his only viable deep threat to be Jerricho Cotchery at this point, lol.

 

Hell, the only true speed WR we have right now is an undrafted rookie who hasn't even been activated the last few games.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Waldo
      Greg Cosell on Bryce Young

      By Waldo · Posted

      For a 3rd year QB? That flies with the Teppers and makes the HC and GM look like fools.  Their fear is evident. Their careers are tied to making it work, it's ehy they signed on here and they are professionals who knows what kind of a situation they could potentially have on their hands if they are not calculating about popping up Bryce. I call BS to that sir. It's why every QB after Bryce couldn't make any other rosters past a PS spot...at best
    • CRA
      Greg Cosell on Bryce Young

      By CRA · Posted

      Not just Dalton.   But the only real young arm they would let be seen the past 2 years was a really a bad Jack Plummer.  Who was super weak even for that tier  Can’t convince me how weak they made the atmosphere around Young hasn’t been intentional.     
    • JawnyBlaze
      Smitty on TMac

      By JawnyBlaze · Posted

      Things of note: mentions he has six drops. Six. For all the people that don’t know what a drop is, he has six. That’s a long distance from the league leader at ten. (To be fair, pro football reference has him at seven, still not bad.  Plenty of others is that same range.  His drop % is 6.3, which is low.) Catchable ball success ratio: 83% which is great. Catchable being the key word.  Mentions his contested catch rate is low at 5/18 but that’ll get better I think when he can rely on muscle memory for routes, catches, etc and the game slows down for him
×
×
  • Create New...