Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who to pull for this week


bigdog10

Recommended Posts

In this thread, I'll give you both sides.

For those holding onto that fading hope of a sub .500 division title, here is your Sunday-Monday cheat sheet.

Pull for the bears, browns and ravens this week.

Pretty much none of the other games matter as our only legitimate shot at the playoffs is a division title.

For those that have packed it in and are looking at our draft position. Here you go

Pull for

Atlanta

Tampa

Houston

Jax

Minnesota

Detroit

Tenn

St. Louis

Seattle

Miami

Washington

New York giants

New York jets

New Orleans.

I personally will be pulling against the south teams. I'd just assume watch some additional meaningful panther games than move a pick or two up. With that said, I don't blame you if you have packed it in and are pulling for positioning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aw man OP, you took my HILARIOUS "everyone ahead of us in the draft" zinger.

If you're a draft guy, definitely pull for NYG and the Rams for the remainder of the season.

Lol. This season sucks so bad that we could legitimately be playing Atlanta for the division title in week 17 where the winner goes to the playoffs and becomes the laughing stock of the league, while the loser gets a top ten pick. Who's the real winner in that scenario?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol. This season sucks so bad that we could legitimately be playing Atlanta for the division title in week 17 where the winner goes to the playoffs and becomes the laughing stock of the league, while the loser gets a top ten pick. Who's the real winner in that scenario?

The next Superbowl winners regular season record will be 5-10-1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to the Patriots-Lions game tomorrow. Was a Lions fan before the Panthers were made and the Panthers are on bye so it's a perfect time for my first trip to Gillette to heckle the fans after the Pats lose. So this week I'm focusing solely on the Lions beating those motherfugers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol. This season sucks so bad that we could legitimately be playing Atlanta for the division title in week 17 where the winner goes to the playoffs and becomes the laughing stock of the league, while the loser gets a top ten pick. Who's the real winner in that scenario?

 

we're already the laughing stock of the league.  might as well get to laugh back in the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So annoying how much momentum we could have had going into the bye. These guys already have playoff experience, who knows what could have happened or could happen if we got in. With that being said that fourth quarter could have planted a seed going forward.

As far as the draft goes, there is no telling who is going to pan out. So I say screw draft position and lets win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...