Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your Perfect Scenario at DT


jramsey4

Recommended Posts

Havent really seen this all in one time in a while and a lot has changed since then so who's everyone's favorite possible Kemo replacement? It can be on any team but obviously they have to have some kind of realistic trade rumors about them.

Mines Correy Williams I am sure you have all heard about him lately. He did absolutely zilch last season in the 3-4 and hasn't shown much improvement in TC for Mangini to keep him. But in Green Bay he tore it up (including against us when Vinny was at QB in 07). He has over a 140 tkls and 17.5 sacks in his career. Most of those came when with GB which at the time was running a D scheme much like our own. I have heard them wanting between a 2nd and a 5th for him. I would be willing to give a 3rd for him but would be ecstatic if we could pull a Harris type of trade and get him for a 5th. That would be the deal of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my perfect situation would be for the FO get creative with cap room, probably by cutting vets for younger alternatives and restructuring current contracts.

Then trade for 1 or 2 DTs for a good rotation. Then sign 1 or 2 DTs off waivers depending on how many we trade for.

I'll let the FO decide who we need, but we need at least 2 if not 3 rotational quality DTs to be solid. The guys we have now really are only good enough for 4th or 5th on the depth chart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my perfect situation would be for the FO get creative with cap room, probably by cutting vets for younger alternatives and restructuring current contracts.

Then trade for 1 or 2 DTs for a good rotation. Then sign 1 or 2 DTs off waivers depending on how many we trade for.

I'll let the FO decide who we need, but we need at least 2 if not 3 rotational quality DTs to be solid. The guys we have now really are only good enough for 4th or 5th on the depth chart.

This :yesnod:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my perfect scenario at DT is Kevin Williams gets cut by the Vikings because Brett Favre said his baby mama is Brett's baby mama, and he can't be having that poo, so Williams gets cut loose, and, at the same time, watches one of those Christian Children's Fund commercials where the train goes by the guy with the beard and after it's passed he's still standing there, so that gets him in a charitable mood, and he wants to sponsor one of those kids but he can't find any phone anywhere at that time, so he channels his giving mood towards the one team whose DT lineup is the weakest in the league, and that would be the Panthers, so he shows up at Hurney's house and offers his work in return for vet minimum, and if he can borrow a hot plate and a fireplace poker. And Hurney agrees

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...