Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your Perfect Scenario at DT


jramsey4

Recommended Posts

Havent really seen this all in one time in a while and a lot has changed since then so who's everyone's favorite possible Kemo replacement? It can be on any team but obviously they have to have some kind of realistic trade rumors about them.

Mines Correy Williams I am sure you have all heard about him lately. He did absolutely zilch last season in the 3-4 and hasn't shown much improvement in TC for Mangini to keep him. But in Green Bay he tore it up (including against us when Vinny was at QB in 07). He has over a 140 tkls and 17.5 sacks in his career. Most of those came when with GB which at the time was running a D scheme much like our own. I have heard them wanting between a 2nd and a 5th for him. I would be willing to give a 3rd for him but would be ecstatic if we could pull a Harris type of trade and get him for a 5th. That would be the deal of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my perfect situation would be for the FO get creative with cap room, probably by cutting vets for younger alternatives and restructuring current contracts.

Then trade for 1 or 2 DTs for a good rotation. Then sign 1 or 2 DTs off waivers depending on how many we trade for.

I'll let the FO decide who we need, but we need at least 2 if not 3 rotational quality DTs to be solid. The guys we have now really are only good enough for 4th or 5th on the depth chart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my perfect situation would be for the FO get creative with cap room, probably by cutting vets for younger alternatives and restructuring current contracts.

Then trade for 1 or 2 DTs for a good rotation. Then sign 1 or 2 DTs off waivers depending on how many we trade for.

I'll let the FO decide who we need, but we need at least 2 if not 3 rotational quality DTs to be solid. The guys we have now really are only good enough for 4th or 5th on the depth chart.

This :yesnod:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my perfect scenario at DT is Kevin Williams gets cut by the Vikings because Brett Favre said his baby mama is Brett's baby mama, and he can't be having that poo, so Williams gets cut loose, and, at the same time, watches one of those Christian Children's Fund commercials where the train goes by the guy with the beard and after it's passed he's still standing there, so that gets him in a charitable mood, and he wants to sponsor one of those kids but he can't find any phone anywhere at that time, so he channels his giving mood towards the one team whose DT lineup is the weakest in the league, and that would be the Panthers, so he shows up at Hurney's house and offers his work in return for vet minimum, and if he can borrow a hot plate and a fireplace poker. And Hurney agrees

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Every team does it's homework. More so than any fan.  Brooks, had he not been injured, would have been a first round talent.  I have zero problems with the team (Dan Morgan and company) drafting Brooks in the 2nd.  He is a fantastic talent.  As far as risk, this is the NFL.  Any and every player is exposed to the same brutality that the NFL is.  Despite Brooks latest setback, it doesn't cost the team much.  Our running back room is stacked.  Could they have drafted someone else? Sure. No promise that someone else would have made an impact last year.  Or this year.   When it's your job to do what Dan does, I pray you get it all right. Lord knows that there isn't a single GM that gets it all right.   
    • Dang, we might not be able to create the same magic from last year!
    • If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation. If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection. If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him. Unfortunately, none of the above were true 1)  We were a terrible team in 2023 and needed an immediate impact player. 2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 NCAA season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024. 3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024. Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024 2021 TMJ 2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick. 2023 Jonathan Mingo 2024 Jonathon Brooks. We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 
×
×
  • Create New...