Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BBR: Safe to Assume Cam Starts Sunday


UNCrules2187

Recommended Posts

If Cam's healthy there's no doubt he should be on the field.  People saying Anderson should start for playing reasons are insane.  He almost threw 3 INTs and had one called back for a questionable roughing the passer penalty (honestly that was a gift).  If there's any doubt about his health or injuring his back more seriously, he should sit.  This is a lost season and risking injury to your franchise QB is not worth the chance at this point in the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Cam's healthy there's no doubt he should be on the field.  People saying Anderson should start for playing reasons are insane.  He almost threw 3 INTs and had one called back for a questionable roughing the passer penalty (honestly that was a gift).  If there's any doubt about his health or injuring his back more seriously, he should sit.  This is a lost season and risking injury to your franchise QB is not worth the chance at this point in the season.

 

 

there was absolutely nothing questionable about the roughing the qb call- hands to the face will be called 100% of the time if it is seen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Cam's healthy there's no doubt he should be on the field.  People saying Anderson should start for playing reasons are insane.  He almost threw 3 INTs and had one called back for a questionable roughing the passer penalty (honestly that was a gift).  If there's any doubt about his health or injuring his back more seriously, he should sit.  This is a lost season and risking injury to your franchise QB is not worth the chance at this point in the season.

 

 

It's easy to forget about those plays. Carolina could have easily lost to Tampa Bay without several things falling their way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fact is Carolina was lucky to beat one of the worst teams in the league.

 

Balls boucning off DB's chests, interceptions called back, fumbles bouncing the right way in the fourth quarter....

 

And with Cam we got killed by one of the worst teams (Minn)...beat by two of the worst teams (NO and Atlanta)...barely beat another of the worst teams (Chicago)....

 

So, what is your point?

 

I think Cam probably gives us the best chance to win if he is ready to go.  However, discounting the win under Anderson the way you did without doing the same to the wins/losses under Cam makes you look like just another homer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And with Cam we got killed by one of the worst teams (Minn)...beat by two of the worst teams (NO and Atlanta)...barely beat another of the worst teams (Chicago)....

 

So, what is your point?

 

that Anderson played a mediocore game against Tampa Bay and was fortunate to get the win

 

 

I'm confident with Cam the margin of victory would have been at least two scores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

probably?

 

 

really? lol

 

Yes...probably.

 

Given the up and down play this season by everyone (including Cam), I have no idea how he will look.

 

He may look like he did in NO (outstanding) or in Minn (like a backup at best).

 

This has just been one of those inconsistent years where anythign is possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First off, my memory is faulty and so I should remember you. Anyways, welcome back. Having been around here since 2004/2005, I do have to say all these hot takes are not necessary new. I still very much remember all the constant complaints about Jake Delhomme. How he was too inaccurate, fumbled the ball too often, threw bad interceptions, and how Steve Smith deserved a better QB. How this franchise needed to replace Jake for someone better because he dragged everyone down. We even had names for Jake defenders; Blind Delhomme Jock Sniffers (BDJS). That one thread about Chris Weinke over Jake Delhomme because Weinke threw for 423 Yards but only scoring 13 points remains the worst hot takes I've ever seen around here. So to me, it feels like history repeating itself again and I don't feel like getting that much involved in flame wars like I used to. I am more of a sit back and see what the players/team does type of person. And even then, yes, there are so many moving parts that it's not as easy to pinpoint the core issues, especially when you're not inside the building and know every single detail.  And yes, I think even way back then, I hated how overvalued the QB position was and it hasn't gotten much better. It's to where my philosophy has shifted to where if you can't win a SB with a QB on their rookie contract, you might as well get another one. Otherwise, you have to give that QB so much money that the rest of the roster suffers and your window becomes quite narrow.  That's why I'm skeptical that Mahomes/Burrow/Jackson/Allen will win more than one or two SB's between them. None of them look as invisible as they did a few years ago and that's because their targets are much inferior and/or they are getting more roughed up behind a worse O-line.
    • Haha I was still off was thinking of mac jones he has done extremely well this year with basically no weopons as all the 49ers are hurt except for mcaffrey but he is playing slow this year for some reason. 
×
×
  • Create New...