Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bill Voth's chat with Gettleman: Understanding offseason plans


Nick_81

Recommended Posts

this is why Voth is an awesome writer, and the guys at the Observer are poo. 

 

 

That introduction was enough to show that he gets how to report on a team, unlike Joe Person who would have had a 10 second interview because he would have only asked about Cam's contract and Hardy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Need influences what BPA for a team

 

If there are two equally graded players and one is of a position of need....you take the position of need.

 

If there are two players graded very closely and one is of need....you usually take the need.

 

If the position of need is graded many positions below another player....the need has no impact on the pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every player we take is a player we need. If we didn't need him, we wouldn't take him. For example, if the BPA is a middle LB, we are going to pass on him (unless he is just as good at OLB). Same at OG. We don't need an OG.

Voth make it sounds like we only need WR, OT and DB. But we also need a great OLB to groom to take TDs spot (TD will be 32 next season, his retirement is around the corner). We need a DE. We need at least one good DT (we do a heavy rotation at DT and Colin Cole will be 35 next season and Dwan Edwards will be 34). We need a S to replace Harper and we need a CB (we play a lot of nickel and you want three really good CBs). We need an OT. As for center, I'm not sure how much longer we'll have Kalil. We need a RB. We need at least two receivers (WR and WR or WR and TE). There is no QB available we can upgrade at QB with. So basically we have a need at every position except QB, OG, probably C, and MLB

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
    • Well, seeing as we play the Lions at home this year, pretty sure that rumor isn't true.
    • Totally possible imo, I also caught that snippet from Morgan where he said “If” we sign him. The lack of competition says otherwise tho 🤷‍♂️
×
×
  • Create New...