Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hurney GM vs Pats Cheating Culture: A scientific poll


SCP

Hurney's Saggy Sack vs. Pats Deflated Balls  

78 members have voted

  1. 1. In your uneducated opinion, what is worse?

    • Pats allegedly filming Panther practices pre-2003 Superb Owl
      20
    • Pats stuffing flat balls in the ball boys ball sack
      0
    • Hurney trading up to draft Armanti
      12
    • Hurney trading away 2010 1st Rd pick to draft Everette Brown in 2009
      6
    • Hurney attempting to trade up to draft Clausen, rumor was it would have lost our #1 pick to draft Cam
      26
    • Projecting Saints defense to use 11 DBs, revolutionizing NFL defense
      1
    • Claiming meringue is pie
      3
    • Claiming to be a fan of the Seahawks and part of the 2012th Man
      5
    • Not noticing your office helmet pointing towards the Gafney butt-peach for the first half of the season
      5


Recommended Posts

Since Hurney is back in the spotlight after raising some questions on his radio show yesterday, I was curious what you, my fellow Panther faithful, feel is the bigger crime.  

 

This poll is sponsored by the TI-30X Pro MultiView™ Scientific Calculator

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just about had a Haht attack.

If we traded UP to get Jimmy and lost out on CAM... just knowing how close we came to doing this...

just about self deficated..

Rumor is he was close to pulling the trade off. That would have set our organization back a damn decade while Cam was balling up in Buffalo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rumor is he was close to pulling the trade off. That would have set our organization back a damn decade while Cam was balling up in Buffalo.

 

Trading the next year's number one or another pick in that draft?  I don't think he was looking to give up the next years' first again.  But if he had, then that would have been the worst decision of his tenure, no doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but that only would have guaranteed that we drafted Andrew Luck the next year...

 

Knowing how he likes to trade, we probably would have traded a 2012 first rounder to trade up in the 2nd to draft Andy Dalton (which would mean no Cam AND no Luke).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This speculation about losing Cam over Clausen all assumes that Cam would have been drafted number 1 in 2011.  At the time there were many pundits who didnt predict he would be drafted or more accurately should be drafted in the top 10.  He was projected to us in the first round because we wanted him, but most folks thought that he was perhaps the 3rd or 4th best quarterback in the draft.  Guys like Mayock thought that Gabbert was a much better QB than Cam. Teams may have picked Ponder or even Jake Locker who went 10 and 8 respectively before Cam.

 

Hurney was right picking Cam though as the other 3 guys mentioned were not even offered a 5th year option and are all scheduled for free agency. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The good thing about replacing a bad player is you really have nothing to lose. If their replacement is bad so what, you didn't get much worse and probably saved money.  
    • I came over from the old Panthers Insider site. When Fox Sports bought that platform it slowly just started dying plus the guy who ran that site was dealing with some pretty significant health issues so the whole thing just slowly fell apart. Quite a few of us migrated over here. Not sure how many are still around.  I miss that place. It struck a nice balance of having enough active posters to keep productive conversation flowing but didn't have so much traffic that you end up with a lot of trolling BS. This place is getting there though since we shutdown new registrations but at some point we're going to have to open it back up or we'll watch this place slowly die off too as posters fall off for one reason or another. We just have to figure out a way to filter out the spam bots. It was a never ending battle to ban the spam bots to keep then from overrunning the site. You'd think they'd be a little more strategic. I mean, if you fill a site with nothing but spam people are just going to stop coming so it's not a sustainable model. But nope, every one of them makes dozens of duplicate threads filling up pages upon pages as soon as their account goes live.
    • lol...I don't remember that.  Although recalling what I had for breakfast yesterday is sometimes a challenge.  Hope it was a positive thing.
×
×
  • Create New...