Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Team moves that you don't like


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

For the most part, once a guy's a Panther I like him until he hinders our chance of winning. Didn't want DeCoud or Cason in FA then we got them and I loved them, then when they started sucking, I wanted their asses cut asap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll get lit up over this but there are some guys (very few) I hate so much that no matter how talented they are I would never in a million years be happy about having them on the team. Tom Brady being one of them... Jimmy Graham, Aqib Talib as well. Some others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of the past, when Hurney blew our 1st round pick on J Stewart just 2 drafts after using our 1st on DWill I screamed Hurney should have been fired on the spot. (Of course there were plenty of other reasons Hurney should already have been on the street)

 

But what else can you do but support the player once he's a Panther?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'd question the point of getting into a bidding war if hell froze over and there was competition for the services of one byron bell.  it seems like gettleman sets a pretty firm limit on his value for his low-mid range targets and if they want more then he has no problem letting them go so i doubt that'll happen.

 

as for the draft, gettleman has had so few whiffs so far that i'd probably trust whatever direction he chose to go in at least on its face

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Things I hated that I shouldn't have hated:

 

Thomas Davis

Cam Newton (thought he was too much of a showboat)

 

Things I hated that I should have hated:

 

Picking a RB with the 13th pick and trading away too much to get a T

Jimmy Clausen

Jimmy Clausen

Sherrod Martin

Trading for Edwards

 

 

Things I was "meh" about that I should have loved:

 

Jon Beason trade

Luke

Kawann Short

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let's say the Panthers either draft, sign or extend a player that you're not all that high on.

Do you attempt to talk yourself into changing your mind about them or do you just go ahead and rage about it?

 

I have absolutely zero trouble/reservations admitting that - despite my obsessive fandom, love of statistics, and daily reading to improve my understanding of the game - I know far less about what our team needs than our coaches, and far less about the best way to address those needs than our GM and personnel department.

 

So I guess the answer would be that I change my mind. I trust their judgment far better than mine and while I have do have a touch of the ego, I'm not self-righteous about my opinions of how to improve the Carolina Panthers. They are professionals; they could make countless, massive mistakes and still do a better job than I ever would.

 

That being said, if we all thought this way (or if I/we actually acted this way 100% of the time), there would be no Huddle. There would be no message boards. No drunken arguments on third and long with a clear draw coming. No, excitement. 

 

And so, we will continue to rage and never be satisfied. There will always be something to complain about; always something to improve.

 

And thank god for that. Life would be so much less enjoyable if we had the perfect team.

 

Yep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let's say the Panthers either draft, sign or extend a player that you're not all that high on.

Do you attempt to talk yourself into changing your mind about them or do you just go ahead and rage about it?

 

 

 

are you new here?

 

 

 

:)

 

something tells me there will be some raging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...