Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL VP: Changing PI to 15-yard penalty a possibility


SgtJoo

Recommended Posts

Vincent suggested an alternate solution to replay that would make PI a 15-yard penalty rather than a spot foul. There's concern that making pass interference reviewable would undermine game officials, who have to make difficult calls in real time.

 

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000473782/article/nfl-vp-changing-pi-to-15yard-penalty-is-a-possibility?campaign=Twitter_atn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do not like, leave it how it is

 

 

The 15 yard version gives incentive to CBs that have been beaten to commit the foul.

 

And that's different than how it is now somehow?

 

 

Currently taking the spot foul even if its on the 1 yard line is better than giving up a potentially undefended TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I agree with the guys before me. I've always preferred the NFL's handling of PI to the college game because it helps keep the competitive aspect honest (not that ole Roger has shown any concern for competitive integrity since taking office)

It's not like these big play PIs happen enough for this to warrant a change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that's different than how it is now somehow?

 

 

Currently taking the spot foul even if its on the 1 yard line is better than giving up a potentially undefended TD.

 

 

To see a deep pass in college broken up by PI, only to result in the offense moving up 15 yards just doesn't seem fair.

 

 

If the rule were changed there would probably be a lot more intentional pass interference penalties commited by the defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't have guys intentionally committing penalties to prevent big plays. Bad idea.

but just think of all the extra play stoppages and commercials we could get out of it.

that one with the all the people who had bad fantasy years just gets me every time man i mean ha-ha.

"One Giant Step" ha-ha get it because he's a Giants fan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, the whole rationale used  for the high IQ point guard is it would allow us to spend our resources elsewhere….instead it’s all our first rounders ever since to support the bad pick.  Reality is our front office is just bad.  If you wanted Bryce Young you were going to need to do something unique and special for him.  Instead we just insert a QB with traditional tools into old NFL concepts that pair with traditional talent and our pass game is whack
    • Good to see some other folks are speaking the same language on this. It's simple common sense. But it seems like there's a disconnect due to the misplaced value the team has put on Thielen because he was the only vaguely good veteran WR willing to sign with the Panthers after we traded away DJ Moore. That time has come and gone. We have two first round WR's on the roster now.
    • Yeah I’m turning this into a Bryce can’t play QB thread. Just stating that offense was a poo show two years ago. No QB is succeeding in that, much less a rookie. I feel like it’s become a common debate strategy on here to just jump down the rabbit hole of saying he is just bad in so many ways when any certain point gets countered. If that doesn’t work we can deflect to how poorly this team has been ran. In regards to the actual point we are debating, the OL was struggling, half of the skill players aren’t on a roster, Mingo has done nothing with his new team and the staff are either not coaching or on their 3rd team in 3 years, aside from McCown (I liked McCown too). Honestly about as bad as it gets. No need to try to state how good of an offense it was billed it because that has been proven false at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...