Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Target Ted Ginn Visited Ten Today; SF Tom


NJPanthers12

Recommended Posts

Guy played here one year, so I'm guessing his ties to the team are not as deep as some hoped. Also, this guy is drawing interest from multiple teams. In a job where your career can be over in one play, he's gonna get that money while he can. Multiple teams interested = more money in his pocket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the fug is his deal? I borderline don't even want him here any more. fug him.

I'm getting to that point as well.. We use his dumb ass as a WR when nobody else would and get him paid... Now he wants to act like anybody else sees him as anything other than a special team player..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The title made me think he visited ten teams.

 

I still like the guy personally. He's a good player. If he's not playing here next year, I still hope he gets a chance on another team and does well. I mean, it's not like we own him or something. We had a chance to keep him last year and chose not to. That's on us, not on Ted Ginn to correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would he really need to visit? Not much has changed since he left, so pretty sure he knows what to expect and Carolina could probably just phone him an offer if they chose.

Well he played in SF for most of his career, but I could see where you're coming from as SF is basically a new team now, new coach, etc. Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Actually I have always felt that using a qb to sneak was a huge mistake even for big guys. Do you remember when Cam sneaked the ball and got a helmet spear to the head and it wasn't even called. It is unnecessary and potentially dangerous. Everyone knows what you are going to do. Why not have a big guy or backup run the ball who is disposable? Yeah they know what is coming if you bring in a big guy. Like they don't if you keep the QB in...... Actually there are many more reasons not to sneak the ball with the qb versus using something else like New Orleans did who could still run or pass.
    • you want me to provide evidence of his jump balls? Or bailing the pocket?  I don't think either of those claims requires me to show you evidence.  What do you want evidence of exactly?  never did I mention downfield throws.  I said, he gets blind to play at the lines because of his size (the quick stuff).  There are literally plays I don't have time to search for but have been highlighted on QB school where there is just no way he can see the options on certain plays even if wide open (talking behind and around the line of scrimmage).   Line too close paired with the receiving  option too close.  And the stat I referenced (which you can find on next gen stats) was he is below average at and behind the line of scrimmage....which I'm sure his size/vision plays a role in the why. I have an agenda? Cool.  Then so do you.  and again, Bryce's cherry picked best play (which isn't how anything works).....still leaves him on the low end of production.  I'm not overly bashing Bryce.  I just acknowledge, most signs point to him having a low ceiling.  And in the big picture, that's not the direction you want to go.  He is our QB for now.  I hope he improves.  Which in turn would allow our O and others to develop.   But to me, there isn't much of an argument that Bryce Young is anything but short term solution.   
    • Again where is the evidence. You keep saying it but honestly you have shown no evidence. Unless you know what he was supposed to do and then what he did do, you don't know anything about his intentions and or forced changes due to height. His completion percentage for passes from 1 to 10 yards was only slightly lower than his best percentage which was 10 to 20 yards passing.  Not enough of a difference to be significantly different.  Truth is you have an agenda that you try to justify despite any evidence to the contrary. Many of us felt the same way but have allowed his actual play to inform our opinion. I still would have picked Stroud over Bryce but I am willing to keep an open mind and see what is there instead of filtering everything through my biases and already polarized opinions.
×
×
  • Create New...